Technology and Operations  
This forum is for discussing technological & operational matters pertaining to U-boats. 
RE: technological differences?
Posted by: Ted Armstrong ()
Date: June 27, 2000 06:46AM

Les;
I have a shot at your question, although some may disagree with
me. I think the American Gato Class subs were a well design fighting
submarine. The U.S Navy had gone to the extremes, having their fleet
of submarines go through a series of logical improvements during
WWII. They were content with the Gato Class & put it in quanitity
production. Unlike the Japanese subs, the Americans did not show
much basic technological differenence. The Japanese subs did have
a aircraft hanger in some boats & some were very huge boats the
Japanese did used during WWII. Japan showed no signs of being
influences by the American Navy, and each year during the war
produced more bigger submarines. Following the trend in their surface
warship designs towards superiority endurance & armament.
The U-boats I think were too slow & noisely, their technological
differenence was that it was base on an ex-WWI type design.
However, the U-boats were later dominated by hostile air attacks
which later failed the German Navy, because it was too slow and had
a very restricted radius of vision.

Regards Ted

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
technological differences? Les 06/27/2000 01:49AM
RE: technological differences? Ted Armstrong 06/27/2000 06:46AM
RE: technological differences? Mike Sung 06/27/2000 12:47PM
RE: technological differences? Rainer Bruns 06/27/2000 03:27PM
RE: technological differences? rabbit 06/27/2000 05:02PM
RE: technological differences? Rainer Bruns 06/27/2000 06:46PM
RE: technological differences? Les 06/27/2000 10:02PM
RE: technological differences? Joe 06/28/2000 06:14AM
RE: technological differences? Rainer Bruns 06/28/2000 03:31PM
RE: technological differences? Joe 06/29/2000 07:20AM
RE: technological differences? Rainer Bruns 06/29/2000 02:01PM
RE: technological differences? Joe 06/30/2000 05:41AM
RE: technological differences? - RN? Rainer Bruns 06/30/2000 01:06PM
RE:measures and countermeasures. Don Dirst 06/30/2000 07:29PM
RE:measures and countermeasures. Tom Manson 07/01/2000 02:14AM
RE:measures and countermeasures. Don Dirst 07/01/2000 11:12AM
RE:measures and countermeasures. Rainer Bruns 07/01/2000 02:29AM
RE:measures and countermeasures. Rainer Bruns 07/01/2000 03:20AM
RE: technological differences? - RN? Rainer Bruns 06/30/2000 01:08PM
RE: technological differences? - RN? Rainer Bruns 06/30/2000 01:09PM
RE:measures and countermeasures. Joe 07/01/2000 12:43AM
RE:measures and countermeasures. Les 07/01/2000 01:20AM
RE: technological differences? Les 06/29/2000 02:39AM
RE: technological differences? Tom Manson 06/28/2000 02:51AM
RE: technological differences? Rainer Bruns 06/28/2000 03:27AM
RE: technological differences? Rick Mann 06/29/2000 12:51AM
RE: technological differences? - RN? Andrew Hetherington 06/30/2000 10:25AM
RE: technological differences? - RN? Rainer Bruns 06/30/2000 01:14PM
RE: technological differences? - RN? Robert Eno 06/30/2000 03:48PM
RE: The more things change...ya know the rest... rabbit 06/30/2000 05:43PM
RE:measures and countermeasures. Tom Manson 07/01/2000 02:31AM
RE:measures and countermeasures. Old Salt - Once There 06/30/2000 11:51PM
RE:single screw maneuverability AL Wellman 07/01/2000 04:16PM
CO2 Filters DS 07/04/2000 03:15AM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  **         ********  **    **  **        
    **     **    **   **    **  ***   **  **    **  
    **     **    **       **    ****  **  **    **  
    **     **    **      **     ** ** **  **    **  
    **     *********    **      **  ****  ********* 
    **           **     **      **   ***        **  
    **           **     **      **    **        **