Technology and Operations  
This forum is for discussing technological & operational matters pertaining to U-boats. 
RE: High tech weapons
Posted by: Tom Iwanski ()
Date: February 11, 2001 03:19AM

Hello Bulldog and SK,

This has been an interesting thread, and though I do not consider myself an expert in this area, I would nonetheless like to add my comments.

I feel that there were three main factors that dictated the outcome of the war in the Atlantic. These were numerical strength, tactics, and technology. Having the advantage in any two of these categories would have been enough to assure victory in the Atlantic Theater, and thus influence the outcome of the war as a whole. I feel the Germans had a tactical and technological advantage very early, but the Allies turned the tables and ultimately gained superiority in all three areas, sealing the fate of the u-boats.

Numerical strength: Germany never had the number of u-boats required to win the tonnage war, especially after the U.S. entered the conflict and production of merchant ships and military hardware ramped up. By 1943, the resources dedicated to u-boat countermeasures were staggering. The \"swamp\" tactics used by allied forces were an example of the extravagant use of resources by the allies.

Tactics: I feel that England in particular was more tactically innovative, especially in developing effective methods for escorts hunting submerged u-boats. German methods of attacking a convoy, however, did not radically change, in part due to the limitations of the u-boats, and in part to limitations within the leadership.

Technology: Once again, I feel England had the edge in the \"timely\" development of weapons that made a crucial difference (the magnetron, the bombe, Collossus, HF/DF). Radar was certainly important, but HF/DF was equally effective for escorts fighting the verbose wolf packs. Ultimately it was the sum total of numerous innovations that tipped the scales so drastically in the allies favor.

And while I am aware that \"what-if\" scenarios are frowned upon, it is still a natural tendency to step back from the Atlantic theater and view how each side managed the war as a whole. With that perspective, it\'s hard not to notice the far reaching consequences of Operation Barbarossa, and the net effect the war with Russia had on Germany\'s ability to compete in those three categories.

Regards,

Tom

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
Vulnerability during schnorkeling? Tom Iwanski 02/05/2001 01:39PM
RE: Vulnerability during schnorkeling? James Stewart 02/05/2001 09:14PM
RE: Vulnerability during schnorkeling? Steve Cooper 02/06/2001 03:07AM
Snorkeling and XXI SuperKraut 02/06/2001 08:49AM
RE: T schnorkels kurt 02/07/2001 10:22PM
T-valve snorkel SuperKraut 02/08/2001 01:29PM
RE: T-valve snorkel Bulldog 02/08/2001 10:48PM
Foresight SuperKraut 02/09/2001 08:16AM
Winning with mediocre weapons Bulldog 02/09/2001 09:40PM
High tech weapons SuperKraut 02/10/2001 09:07AM
RE: High tech weapons Bulldog 02/10/2001 08:56PM
RE: High tech weapons SuperKraut 02/11/2001 01:34AM
RE: High tech weapons Tom Iwanski 02/11/2001 03:19AM
RE: High tech weapons SuperKraut 02/11/2001 12:53PM
RE: High tech weapons Bulldog (which one?) 02/11/2001 09:50PM
Bulldog on Frasier Rick Mann 02/12/2001 03:49PM
RE: Bulldog on Frasier Bulldog 02/12/2001 09:17PM
RE: High tech weapons SuperKraut 02/12/2001 04:21PM
RE: High tech weapons Bulldog 02/12/2001 11:20PM
RE: T-valve snorkel kurt 02/10/2001 07:11PM
RE: T-valve snorkel Tom Iwanski 02/10/2001 09:25PM
RE: T-valve snorkel Anders Wingren 02/10/2001 10:40PM
RE: Snorkeling and XXI Tom Iwanski 02/10/2001 09:15PM
Snorkel history SuperKraut 02/11/2001 01:50PM
RE: Snorkel history Tom Iwanski 02/11/2001 04:32PM
RE: Snorkeling and XXI Don Dirst 02/06/2001 10:34PM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **    **  **     **  ********  ********  **    ** 
 **   **   **     **  **        **    **  **   **  
 **  **    **     **  **            **    **  **   
 *****     **     **  ******       **     *****    
 **  **    **     **  **          **      **  **   
 **   **   **     **  **          **      **   **  
 **    **   *******   ********    **      **    **