WWI forum
World War One discussions.
Re: HMS Zaida
Posted by:
Brian
()
Date: March 03, 2003 01:39AM
<HTML>Hi Simon,
as far as I know the Gulf of Alexandretta was not a British mined area due to lack of enemy traffic there, but the possibility cannot be discounted. Another possibility is an internal explosion which was never properly investigated, however, I would like to know how Colledge came up with U-35 as the attacker, he must have based his assessment on a faily reliable source, but which one?
Brian</HTML>
as far as I know the Gulf of Alexandretta was not a British mined area due to lack of enemy traffic there, but the possibility cannot be discounted. Another possibility is an internal explosion which was never properly investigated, however, I would like to know how Colledge came up with U-35 as the attacker, he must have based his assessment on a faily reliable source, but which one?
Brian</HTML>
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
HMS Zaida | Brian | 03/01/2003 02:55AM |
Re: HMS Zaida | Dänemark | 03/01/2003 01:21PM |
Re: HMS Zaida | Dänemark | 03/01/2003 01:28PM |
Re: HMS Zaida | Brian | 03/01/2003 02:13PM |
Re: HMS Zaida | Dänemark | 03/01/2003 03:48PM |
Re: HMS Zaida | Simon | 03/01/2003 05:08PM |
Re: HMS Zaida | Brian | 03/02/2003 02:25AM |
Re: HMS Zaida | Simon | 03/02/2003 08:01AM |
Re: HMS Zaida | Brian | 03/03/2003 01:39AM |
Re: HMS Zaida | Michael Lowrey | 03/03/2003 03:37AM |
Re: Colledge | Brian | 03/04/2003 04:41AM |
Re: Colledge | Oliver Lörscher | 03/04/2003 09:44AM |
Re: Hooray! | Brian | 03/05/2003 12:03AM |
Re: HMS Zaida | Jim Baumann | 11/04/2007 11:52PM |
Re: HMS Zaida | Yasar Karalar | 10/26/2007 07:21AM |