WWI forum
World War One discussions.
Re: Canadian ship SS Dunelm -- Oct 1915
Posted by:
Michael Lowrey
()
Date: January 30, 2009 11:47PM
Ed,
Dunelm is not considered to be a war loss. In fact, I don't even see a vague possibility that a U-bat sank her -- I have microfilmed copies of most U-boat war diaries (KTBs) and late October 1915 was during a lull in U-boat activity outside of teh North Sea and Mediterranean. With one exception (U 38, en route to the Med -- and even w/o checking her KTB, based upon the date and location of her sinkings, not a possibility), there were literally no German submarines in the Atlantic at that time.
Best wishes,
Michael
Dunelm is not considered to be a war loss. In fact, I don't even see a vague possibility that a U-bat sank her -- I have microfilmed copies of most U-boat war diaries (KTBs) and late October 1915 was during a lull in U-boat activity outside of teh North Sea and Mediterranean. With one exception (U 38, en route to the Med -- and even w/o checking her KTB, based upon the date and location of her sinkings, not a possibility), there were literally no German submarines in the Atlantic at that time.
Best wishes,
Michael
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
Canadian ship SS Dunelm -- Oct 1915 | Ed Barbour | 01/30/2009 10:27PM |
Re: Canadian ship SS Dunelm -- Oct 1915 | Michael Lowrey | 01/30/2009 11:47PM |
Re: Canadian ship SS Dunelm -- Oct 1915 | Ed Barbour | 06/13/2009 08:08PM |
Re: Canadian ship SS Dunelm -- Oct 1915 | Ron Young | 06/14/2009 12:46PM |
Re: Canadian ship SS Dunelm -- Oct 1915 | Ron Young | 06/14/2009 01:03PM |
Re: Canadian ship SS Dunelm -- Oct 1915 | Morgan Woodward | 12/21/2011 06:22PM |