General Discussions
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII.
RE: Okay, let\\\\\\\'s settle this matter once and
Posted by:
John Griffiths
()
Date: March 07, 2001 05:25PM
<HTML>First off I side with Rainer on this.
Second, how many of those who say it\'s okay to loot the dead have actually fought? Hmm, I wonder. All of the gung-ho types who spout out their battle cries without having been in the heat of battle are not worthy of consideration. More, are not worth the space. If you\'d have been on the receiving end of modern weaponry you might just stop to think about other things - and looting is the furthest from your mind.
\'Looting\' has been, always will be, a part of the scene whenever there is action. It\'s human nature. Myself, I find it despicable and below the morals and attitude we subscribe to when we take the colours - no matter whose side we fight on.
The ultimate desecration is to loot. There is no honour in robbing - that is, taking without consent or order - of the fallen. Those who do are no better than thieves.
How many high moral rollers got their rocks off when artefacts from their side were proven to be the result of looting? I bet they get jiggy when that happens! I heard that the US got mighty arsed when it was proven that the Vietnamese were doing just that - despite the fact that many US servicemen earned a fair bit of cash stealing bits of kit from the VC. As for when the Germans took stuff - oh dear! Quite a few Congressmen were written to then! Funny how it\'s viewed as a moral outrage when we have decided who are the good guys and who are the bad!
Truth is, \'To the Victor the spoils\' does NOT mean robbing the dead.
Whatever, if artefacts are removed with due reverence for the dead - fair enough. A ceremony, due respect - that\'s all for the good. But to loot the dead?
What ever happened to tradition and \'The Art of War?\'.
There is no honour any more.
Aye,
John</HTML>
Second, how many of those who say it\'s okay to loot the dead have actually fought? Hmm, I wonder. All of the gung-ho types who spout out their battle cries without having been in the heat of battle are not worthy of consideration. More, are not worth the space. If you\'d have been on the receiving end of modern weaponry you might just stop to think about other things - and looting is the furthest from your mind.
\'Looting\' has been, always will be, a part of the scene whenever there is action. It\'s human nature. Myself, I find it despicable and below the morals and attitude we subscribe to when we take the colours - no matter whose side we fight on.
The ultimate desecration is to loot. There is no honour in robbing - that is, taking without consent or order - of the fallen. Those who do are no better than thieves.
How many high moral rollers got their rocks off when artefacts from their side were proven to be the result of looting? I bet they get jiggy when that happens! I heard that the US got mighty arsed when it was proven that the Vietnamese were doing just that - despite the fact that many US servicemen earned a fair bit of cash stealing bits of kit from the VC. As for when the Germans took stuff - oh dear! Quite a few Congressmen were written to then! Funny how it\'s viewed as a moral outrage when we have decided who are the good guys and who are the bad!
Truth is, \'To the Victor the spoils\' does NOT mean robbing the dead.
Whatever, if artefacts are removed with due reverence for the dead - fair enough. A ceremony, due respect - that\'s all for the good. But to loot the dead?
What ever happened to tradition and \'The Art of War?\'.
There is no honour any more.
Aye,
John</HTML>