General Discussions
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII.
RE: Neutral shipping losses
Posted by:
Ken Dunn
()
Date: March 25, 2001 02:43PM
<HTML>Hi Visje,
I am also trying to understand this. My interest is in exactly what the German rules of engagement were on October 19, 1941 for neutral ships. In the timeframe you are talking about I think a number of the ships sunk were in convoys. If that is true, I think being in an escorted convoy made them legal targets. Also, “operational areas†were declared by Germany in which any ship could be sunk.
In the case I am interested in the ship was attacked during the day. It was zigzagging and that and its course made the sub commander think it was a legitimate target.
I am of the opinion that if a country helps another country that is at war they do it at their own peril. For example, I think we were correct when we went into Cambodia during the Vietnam War. The North Vietnamese were operating against us from a neutral country and we went in after them. The only thing we did that was wrong was that we didn’t go in soon enough and we didn’t stay long enough to finish the job. I have a hard time condemning Germany for doing the same thing. On the other hand, right and wrong have nothing to do with laws.
Does anybody know what the German rules were at this time? How about the rules of the other side? Under what conditions could a neutral ship be sunk?
Regards,
Ken Dunn
</HTML>
I am also trying to understand this. My interest is in exactly what the German rules of engagement were on October 19, 1941 for neutral ships. In the timeframe you are talking about I think a number of the ships sunk were in convoys. If that is true, I think being in an escorted convoy made them legal targets. Also, “operational areas†were declared by Germany in which any ship could be sunk.
In the case I am interested in the ship was attacked during the day. It was zigzagging and that and its course made the sub commander think it was a legitimate target.
I am of the opinion that if a country helps another country that is at war they do it at their own peril. For example, I think we were correct when we went into Cambodia during the Vietnam War. The North Vietnamese were operating against us from a neutral country and we went in after them. The only thing we did that was wrong was that we didn’t go in soon enough and we didn’t stay long enough to finish the job. I have a hard time condemning Germany for doing the same thing. On the other hand, right and wrong have nothing to do with laws.
Does anybody know what the German rules were at this time? How about the rules of the other side? Under what conditions could a neutral ship be sunk?
Regards,
Ken Dunn
</HTML>
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
Neutral shipping losses | Visje | 03/25/2001 12:45PM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Ken Dunn | 03/25/2001 02:43PM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Visje | 03/25/2001 04:26PM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Ken Dunn | 03/25/2001 10:53PM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Visje | 03/27/2001 08:02AM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Rainer Kolbicz | 03/26/2001 07:45PM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | kpp | 03/26/2001 09:46PM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Roy Prince | 03/26/2001 11:44PM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Visje | 03/27/2001 06:11AM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Rainer Kolbicz | 03/27/2001 09:45AM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Rainer Kolbicz | 03/27/2001 10:06AM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Jan-Olof | 03/27/2001 04:24PM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Antonio Veiga | 03/25/2001 07:10PM |