General Discussions
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII.
realities of war
Posted by:
kurt
()
Date: June 06, 2001 03:41PM
<HTML>The reality of war is that few soldiers will risk themselves, even to the smallest degree, to help save enemy troops who are trying to surrender, be it on land or sea. Let alone a whole crew and a valuable escort ship.
Stopping a destroyer to pick up U-boat survivors makes it a sitting duck for any other U-boat in the area. Maybe there were other U-boats around. Maybe not. They had no way of knowing for a fact if it was safe to stop. Why risk it? These U-boat crew were trying to kill us just a few minutes before....and now they want us to risk our necks to save them? If the tables were turned and we were splashing in the water the U-boat crew wouldn\'t lift a finger to help us!
Or so I can imagine the crew feeling at the time.
Remember that U-boat crews, by operational dynamics of sub operations, normally did not stop to assist the victims of their sinkings. There were also many stories (false, or mistaken, as it turns out) of U-boats shooting at lifeboats and such that were floating about. Allied naval personnel were under the general impression that U-boat crewmen were heartless pirates who left all to drown in the cold ocean without mercy or quarter - the truth of the honorable behaviour of the U-boat men did not become clear and widely known till after the war.
The commander in this case exersized his judgement in not stopping - he probably had the right to not follow his orders if he felt it was operationaly dangerous or innappropriate - commanders are generally given some latitude in how to carry out their orders, balancing their responsibilities to accomplish their main mission, and to safeguard their crew and ship.
There are many cases of allied ships abandoning even their own vicitms to the sea because of operational needs - one case in point is when the Queen Mary collided and instantly sank its escort, it streamed on, knowing that the surviving crew of the escort, who did not have time to launch any lifeboats, would be helpess in the sea, but it was too risky to stop.
Weddingen, in WWI, opened up the sub era by sinking three warships in a row, two of whom were at a dead stop to rescue the victims of his first sinking. People learned: never stop when subs are known or thought to be in the area.
</HTML>
Stopping a destroyer to pick up U-boat survivors makes it a sitting duck for any other U-boat in the area. Maybe there were other U-boats around. Maybe not. They had no way of knowing for a fact if it was safe to stop. Why risk it? These U-boat crew were trying to kill us just a few minutes before....and now they want us to risk our necks to save them? If the tables were turned and we were splashing in the water the U-boat crew wouldn\'t lift a finger to help us!
Or so I can imagine the crew feeling at the time.
Remember that U-boat crews, by operational dynamics of sub operations, normally did not stop to assist the victims of their sinkings. There were also many stories (false, or mistaken, as it turns out) of U-boats shooting at lifeboats and such that were floating about. Allied naval personnel were under the general impression that U-boat crewmen were heartless pirates who left all to drown in the cold ocean without mercy or quarter - the truth of the honorable behaviour of the U-boat men did not become clear and widely known till after the war.
The commander in this case exersized his judgement in not stopping - he probably had the right to not follow his orders if he felt it was operationaly dangerous or innappropriate - commanders are generally given some latitude in how to carry out their orders, balancing their responsibilities to accomplish their main mission, and to safeguard their crew and ship.
There are many cases of allied ships abandoning even their own vicitms to the sea because of operational needs - one case in point is when the Queen Mary collided and instantly sank its escort, it streamed on, knowing that the surviving crew of the escort, who did not have time to launch any lifeboats, would be helpess in the sea, but it was too risky to stop.
Weddingen, in WWI, opened up the sub era by sinking three warships in a row, two of whom were at a dead stop to rescue the victims of his first sinking. People learned: never stop when subs are known or thought to be in the area.
</HTML>
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
crew of U-470 abandoned | Dave McQueen | 06/05/2001 08:12PM |
RE: crew of U-470 abandoned | Brian Corijn | 06/05/2001 09:03PM |
RE: crew of U-470 abandoned | Dave McQueen | 06/06/2001 07:04AM |
RE: crew of U-470 abandoned | Steve Cooper | 06/06/2001 12:27PM |
RE: USS Juneau | Rainer Bruns | 06/06/2001 01:03PM |
RE: crew of U-470 abandoned | becorijn@zeelandnet.nl | 06/06/2001 01:14PM |
USS Juneau | Michael Lowrey | 06/06/2001 02:41PM |
RE: USS Juneau | Michael Lowrey | 06/06/2001 03:22PM |
RE: crew of U-470 abandoned | Rainer Bruns | 06/06/2001 01:11PM |
RE: crew of U-470 abandoned | Steve | 06/06/2001 01:29PM |
RE: crew of U-470 abandoned -Dave | John Griffiths | 06/06/2001 05:18PM |
RE: crew of U-470 abandoned -Dave | Ted Agar | 06/06/2001 07:29PM |
RE: crew of U-470 abandoned -Dave | Tom Iwanski | 06/06/2001 07:59PM |
in defense of Mush | kurt | 06/06/2001 08:55PM |
RE: in defense of Mush | Steve Cooper | 06/07/2001 01:27PM |
Mushs first wahoos third | kurt | 06/07/2001 03:21PM |
RE: in defense of Eck | Tim | 06/08/2001 01:44AM |
Eck knew he was killing survivors | kurt | 06/08/2001 05:05PM |
With all due respect John | Dave McQueen | 06/07/2001 06:44AM |
RE: With all due respect John | John Griffiths | 06/07/2001 04:10PM |
RE: crew of U-470 abandoned | Steve | 06/06/2001 12:19AM |
RE: crew of U-470 abandoned | Joe Brennan | 06/06/2001 06:00AM |
RE: other example | Rainer Bruns | 06/06/2001 01:06PM |
realities of war | kurt | 06/06/2001 03:41PM |
RE: realities of war | Walt | 06/06/2001 10:08PM |
RE: realities of war | Steve | 06/07/2001 10:02AM |
RE: wrong spot, defending Mush | Rainer Bruns | 06/06/2001 11:31PM |
Mush and Eck | kurt | 06/07/2001 04:01AM |
RE: Mush and Eck | Rainer Bruns | 06/07/2001 11:32AM |
RE: Mush and Eck | Walt | 06/07/2001 12:04PM |
RE: Mush and Eck | Steve Cooper | 06/07/2001 01:21PM |
RE: Mush and Eck | Walt | 06/07/2001 04:59PM |
RE: Mush and Eck | Tim | 06/08/2001 02:06AM |
RE: Mush and Eck | Rainer Bruns | 06/07/2001 03:43PM |
RE: Mush and Eck | Walt | 06/07/2001 04:57PM |
different opinions | kurt | 06/07/2001 03:56PM |
RE: different opinions | Rich Mickle | 06/07/2001 11:03PM |
RE: different opinions | Siri Lawson | 06/08/2001 03:56AM |
RE: different opinions | Rich Mickle | 06/08/2001 08:51AM |