General Discussions  
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII. 
Go to: Forum List•Message List•New Topic•Search•Log In•Print View
RE: U 676 flak claims. Part 2.
Posted by: Rainer Kolbicz ()
Date: July 17, 2001 04:18PM

<HTML>Hi Andrey

U-676 probably misidentified the Yak-9 as Il-2 (both single engined).
Personally I do not believe that they downed a heavy armoured Sturmovik.
Perhaps they damaged the Pe-2 (smoke trails or similar). Have you checked this in your sources?

Regards
Rainer</HTML>

Options: Reply•Quote


Subject Written By Posted
U 676 flak claims. Part 2. Andrey 07/17/2001 02:21PM
RE: U 676 flak claims. Part 2. Rainer Kolbicz 07/17/2001 04:18PM
20mm Flakvierling more than enough to down an Il 2 Nonny 07/18/2001 04:12PM
RE: Flakvierling just enough to perhaps down Il 2 Rainer Kolbicz 07/18/2001 08:48PM
RE: Flakvierling just enough to perhaps down Il 2 Andrey 07/19/2001 03:47PM
Was U676 armed with a 3.7 cm/57 Flak M43? Nonny 07/19/2001 05:04PM
RE: Was U676 armed with a 3.7 cm/57 Flak M43? Rainer Kolbicz 07/19/2001 10:16PM
RE: Flakvierling just enough to perhaps down Il 2 Rainer Kolbicz 07/19/2001 06:44PM


Go to: Forum List•Message List•Search•Log In
Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **         ********  **    **  **    **  ********  
 **    **   **        **   **   **   **   **     ** 
 **    **   **        **  **    **  **    **     ** 
 **    **   ******    *****     *****     ********  
 *********  **        **  **    **  **    **        
       **   **        **   **   **   **   **        
       **   **        **    **  **    **  **