General Discussions  
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII. 
RE: U-134 vs. K-74
Posted by: Tim ()
Date: August 27, 2001 04:13AM

<HTML>The remark about the recoil was more tongue in cheek than anything. Interesting thought crossed my mind though, regarding the big caliber guns and low flying aircraft. I have read of incidents of Japanese cruisers and battleships firing their main guns at low trajectory to ward off torpedo bombers. The impact splash would disrupt the torpedo plane\'s run in. And, if the plane was unlucky enough to hit the splash ..... well, would be like hitting a wall. I think I\'d rather try spooking with 20mms on the wintergarten, then get a lot of water over me than waste the time to deploy the deck gun crew.</HTML>

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
U-134 vs. K-74 Tim 08/24/2001 12:57AM
RE: U-134 vs. K-74 Joe Brennan 08/24/2001 04:35AM
RE: U-134 vs. K-74 Tim 08/26/2001 03:41AM
RE: U-134 vs. K-74 Marc Haldimann 08/26/2001 10:21AM
RE: U-134 vs. K-74 Tim 08/27/2001 04:13AM
Re: RE: U-134 vs. K-74 TF 09/22/2015 05:08PM
RE: U-134 vs. K-74 Marc Haldimann 08/24/2001 05:06AM
RE: U-134 vs. K-74 Rich Mickle 08/25/2001 07:08PM
RE: U-134 vs. K-74 Joe Brennan 08/25/2001 10:28PM
RE: U-134 vs. K-74 Rich Mickle 08/26/2001 05:39PM
RE:Battle damage Joe Brennan 08/27/2001 05:01AM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  ********   ********   **     **  **      ** 
 ***   ***  **     **  **     **  **     **  **  **  ** 
 **** ****  **     **  **     **  **     **  **  **  ** 
 ** *** **  ********   **     **  *********  **  **  ** 
 **     **  **         **     **  **     **  **  **  ** 
 **     **  **         **     **  **     **  **  **  ** 
 **     **  **         ********   **     **   ***  ***