Technology and Operations  
This forum is for discussing technological & operational matters pertaining to U-boats. 
RE: S-Boats
Posted by: Steve Cooper ()
Date: October 23, 2000 12:00PM

Ah, the Sugar-Boats weren't THAT bad. Underwater performance was actually a little better than the Gatos and they had some success, including the heavy cruiser Kago. I believe more S-boats were lost from running aground than enemy action.
My memory here is thin, and I hope someone with better sources can jump in, but I remember reading US Commanders refer to "Riding the vents" while on patrol. If there was a choice to rely on just the vent valves, it means that there must be bottom valves. Also, without bottom valves, you could not completely blow tanks and keep them empty while underway. Sea action would slop a certain amount of water into the tanks. Also, on a sub, redundant is a good thing. I would think that valves top and bottom would be standard design for any boat.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
U-995 Keel Max 10/09/2000 04:48AM
RE: U-995 Keel joe brandt 10/09/2000 08:51PM
RE: U-995 Keel Max 10/10/2000 03:44PM
RE: U-995 Keel Steve Cooper 10/10/2000 02:32PM
RE: U-995 Keel Jeff LaRue 10/11/2000 09:09PM
RE: U-995 Keel Max 10/12/2000 02:55PM
RE: U-995 Keel Garth 10/16/2000 04:51AM
RE: U-995 Keel Steve Cooper 10/16/2000 04:27PM
S-Boats Rick Mann 10/22/2000 01:11AM
RE: S-Boats Steve Cooper 10/23/2000 12:00PM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **    **  **     **  **     **  **        **     ** 
 ***   **  **     **  **     **  **        **     ** 
 ****  **  **     **  **     **  **        **     ** 
 ** ** **  **     **  **     **  **        **     ** 
 **  ****   **   **   **     **  **         **   **  
 **   ***    ** **    **     **  **          ** **   
 **    **     ***      *******   ********     ***