Technology and Operations  
This forum is for discussing technological & operational matters pertaining to U-boats. 
Diesel-Electric Submarines vis-a-vis Nuclear
Posted by: Robert Murphy ()
Date: December 23, 2005 08:41PM

I read an article not so long ago on the Seawolf class attack sub. (There are--or soon will be--three of them?) I generally find that articles on current military hardware aren't very reliable; the obvious reasons being that the DoD is usually trying to 'promote' the given weapons system in the eyes of the public (hence they're always ready to cooperate with a potentially sympathetic journalist), and, of course, so much information remains classified. But...

One claim about the Seawolf attack submarine struck me, and that is that the Navy claims it has 'silent speed' of up to 21 knots. I.e. if 'press releases' are to be believed, it can move at that rate and stay undetected, without compromising its passive sonar.

However...

I've also recently been reading a few articles on just how potentially grave a threat diesel-electric boats could pose, not just to US surface groups but to US nuclear submarines. (Thanks again to Robert M. for some choice links here...) It seems that in naval exercises diesel-electrics score 'kills' with a disturbing frequency.

Well, before I write a novel here, my question is this: just how much louder are nuclear submarines to diesel-electric boats? We can only postulate here, of course, but is technologically feasible to make nuclear boat as quiet?

Er, query two, is there any evidence that diesel-electrics (virtually undetectable through passive means, I understand) can be defeated with effective ASW tactics and existing technology?

Any feedback greatly appreciated.

Cheers,

Robert

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
Diesel-Electric Submarines vis-a-vis Nuclear Robert Murphy 12/23/2005 08:41PM
Re: Diesel-Electric Submarines vis-a-vis Nuclear danodenweller 12/23/2005 10:53PM
Re: Diesel-Electric Submarines vis-a-vis Nuclear ROBERT M. 12/24/2005 04:11PM
Re: Diesel-Electric Submarines vis-a-vis Nuclear danodenweller 12/24/2005 04:52PM
Re: Diesel-Electric Submarines vis-a-vis Nuclear George G. 10/24/2012 03:03PM
Re: Diesel-Electric Submarines vis-a-vis Nuclear danodenweller 12/24/2005 05:00PM
Re: Diesel-Electric Submarines vis-a-vis Nuclear Robert Murphy 12/24/2005 10:37PM
Re: Diesel-Electric Submarines vis-a-vis Nuclear ROBERT M. 12/24/2005 11:22PM
Re: Diesel-Electric Submarines vis-a-vis Nuclear ROBERT M. 12/26/2005 04:39PM
Re: Diesel-Electric Submarines vis-a-vis Nuclear Mike 12/27/2005 04:07AM
Re: Diesel-Electric Submarines vis-a-vis Nuclear danodenweller 12/27/2005 05:44PM
Re: Hmmm... Robert Murphy 12/31/2005 02:38AM
Re: Hmmm... ROBERT M. 01/03/2006 06:30AM
Re: Hmmm... chinggis 01/03/2006 02:58PM
Re: Hmmm... ROBERT M. 01/03/2006 04:14PM
Re: Hmmm... danodenweller 01/03/2006 06:05PM
Re: Hmmm... chinggis 01/03/2006 10:10PM
Re: Hmmm... danodenweller 01/04/2006 12:50AM
Re: Hmmm... chinggis 01/04/2006 09:09PM
Re: Hmmm... Robert Murphy 01/04/2006 06:32AM
U-boats and towed arrays? kurt 01/04/2006 02:40PM
Re: U-boats and towed arrays? ROBERT M. 01/04/2006 06:54PM
Re: U-boats and towed arrays? ROBERT M. 02/05/2006 07:27PM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   ********  **        **         **     ** 
 **     **  **    **  **        **    **   **     ** 
 **     **      **    **        **    **   **     ** 
 **     **     **     **        **    **   **     ** 
 **     **    **      **        *********   **   **  
 **     **    **      **              **     ** **   
 ********     **      ********        **      ***