Warship forum
A forum for the Allied Warships section.
Re: Petropavlovsk's condition
Posted by:
Brian
()
Date: February 20, 2003 04:53AM
<HTML>Please bear in mind that you cannot really call Petropavlovsk an operational unit. She was fitted with 3-203mm guns and acted as a floating battery, unable to move on her own, she could fight (to a certain extent) but not run away, thus lacking the main requirement to be considered a warship: mobility.
Regards, Brian
PS: our gracious host's name is Gudmundur, not Gundmar</HTML>
Regards, Brian
PS: our gracious host's name is Gudmundur, not Gundmar</HTML>
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
Lutzow (Hipper-class) in russian service | Nakhimovetz | 02/19/2003 06:54PM |
Re: Petropavlovsk's condition | Brian | 02/20/2003 04:53AM |
Re: Petropavlovsk's condition | George Roumbos | 02/20/2003 02:14PM |
Re: Lutzow (Hipper-class) in russian service | Gerard | 02/20/2003 05:24PM |
Re: Lutzow (Hipper-class) in russian service | George Roumbos | 02/24/2003 01:54PM |
Re: Lutzow (Hipper-class) in russian service | J.S. | 02/26/2003 06:34PM |