WWI forum
World War One discussions.
Re: SMU-37, additional
Posted by:
Brian
()
Date: July 29, 2003 01:59AM
<HTML>This according th Sieche:
"U 31 had no deck gun when lost, U 32, 36 and 37 had 2-88 for a time". Could it be a mis-identification of the gun-less sub?
Brian</HTML>
"U 31 had no deck gun when lost, U 32, 36 and 37 had 2-88 for a time". Could it be a mis-identification of the gun-less sub?
Brian</HTML>
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
SMU-37 | Yves D | 07/28/2003 08:56PM |
Re: SMU-37 | Brian | 07/29/2003 01:55AM |
Re: SMU-37, additional | Brian | 07/29/2003 01:59AM |
Re: SMU-37, addenda | Yves D | 07/29/2003 04:48AM |
Re: SMU-37, additional | Yves D | 07/29/2003 04:33AM |
Re: SMU-37 | john | 07/29/2003 04:17PM |
Re: SMU-37 | Yves D | 07/29/2003 08:13PM |