WWI forum
World War One discussions.
Re: U35
Posted by:
Dänemark
()
Date: October 24, 2003 07:37PM
<HTML>Hi J.M.
I can only give you right. But sometimes the books there are mistakes in the books and they will be passed on to new books.
But I still have a question on U35. I have an old foto of U35 laying along a steamer in a harbour. The problem is that on the back is an old handwriting "U35 and steamer Roma interned in Carthagena". I have tried to find out if there was something about it, but didn't find any proofs for it should have happened. I don't know who the writer was or where he had the info from. As far as I can see U35 was only in the harbour of Carthagena the 21.6.1916 to deliver a letter from the german imperor to the spanish king, and left again without any internment.
With regards
Dänemark</HTML>
I can only give you right. But sometimes the books there are mistakes in the books and they will be passed on to new books.
But I still have a question on U35. I have an old foto of U35 laying along a steamer in a harbour. The problem is that on the back is an old handwriting "U35 and steamer Roma interned in Carthagena". I have tried to find out if there was something about it, but didn't find any proofs for it should have happened. I don't know who the writer was or where he had the info from. As far as I can see U35 was only in the harbour of Carthagena the 21.6.1916 to deliver a letter from the german imperor to the spanish king, and left again without any internment.
With regards
Dänemark</HTML>
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
U35 | J.M. Cast. | 10/24/2003 06:23PM |
Re: U35 | Dänemark | 10/24/2003 07:37PM |
Re: U35 | J.M. Cast. | 10/25/2003 05:37PM |