WWI forum
World War One discussions.
Re: CREOSOL & VITOL
Posted by:
Michael Lowrey
()
Date: November 06, 2003 02:18PM
<HTML>David,
Creosol of 1179 rt was sunk by UC 17 off Sunderland.
There is no German sinking attribution for Vitol. This does not necessarily mean Dittmar and Colledge were in error though -- there are a number of other vessels for which no sinking attibution exists but are quite real losses. These will all be tracked down eventually but it's a time consuming process.
Best wishes,
Michael</HTML>
Creosol of 1179 rt was sunk by UC 17 off Sunderland.
There is no German sinking attribution for Vitol. This does not necessarily mean Dittmar and Colledge were in error though -- there are a number of other vessels for which no sinking attibution exists but are quite real losses. These will all be tracked down eventually but it's a time consuming process.
Best wishes,
Michael</HTML>
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
CREOSOL & VITOL | David H | 11/06/2003 01:59PM |
Re: CREOSOL & VITOL | Michael Lowrey | 11/06/2003 02:18PM |
Re: CREOSOL & VITOL | David H | 11/07/2003 07:50AM |
Re: CREOSOL & VITOL | Ron | 11/07/2003 09:25AM |
Re: CREOSOL & VITOL | Deryck Swetnam | 11/08/2003 10:23AM |