Re: UC 50
Posted by:
Bruce
()
Date: July 16, 2004 02:00AM
This site just lists her as missing after 7/1. And says the attack by HMS Zubian, on 4/2, was against UC79, which escaped damaged. In Verschollen, Messimer says "Trawlers dragged the area and found an obstruction that British divers later identified as UC50."
What did the divers actually find? Or was it a bogus claim?
What did the divers actually find? Or was it a bogus claim?
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
Re: UC 50 | Bruce | 07/16/2004 02:00AM |
Re: UC 50 | Michael Lowrey | 07/16/2004 04:56AM |
Re: UC 50 | Bruce | 07/16/2004 04:39PM |
Re: UB 7 & UB 107 | Bruce | 07/16/2004 05:05PM |
Re: UB 7 & UB 107 | Michael Lowrey | 07/17/2004 01:55AM |
Re: UB 7 & UB 107 | Bruce | 07/17/2004 02:44AM |
Re: UB 7 & UB 107 | Ron Young | 07/17/2004 10:50AM |
Re: UB 7 & UB 107 | Michael Lowrey | 07/17/2004 05:08PM |
Re: UB 7 & UB 107 | Dänemark | 07/17/2004 09:12PM |
Re: UB 7 & UB 107 | Michael Lowrey | 07/17/2004 10:07PM |
Re: UB 7 & UB 107 | Bruce | 07/18/2004 03:02AM |
Re: UB 7 & UB 107 | Michael Lowrey | 07/18/2004 02:14PM |
Re: UB 7 & UB 107 | Dänemark | 07/18/2004 04:35PM |