WWI forum  
World War One discussions. 
Re: ANTINOUS 2 Sept 1916
Posted by: Michael Lowrey ()
Date: September 12, 2018 01:29PM

Joe,

I've had a look at U 38's KTB, and based upon what's in there, there isn't enough evidence to credit U 38 with damaging ANTINOUS. (A listing in the ships damaged section of "Lloyd's War Losses" isn't enough as LWL includes some ships there that weren't actually damaged.)

Based upon the description in the KTB and what's in BVLAS, this apparently is a torpedo miss on September 1, 1916 with U 38 then surfacing and opening fire on an armed steamer. Valentiner soon broke off the action.

U 38 also had a short firefight with an armed steamer the next day.

In neither case did U 38 claim to have to have hit the steamer.

Best wishes,
Michael

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
ANTINOUS 2 Sept 1916 Josephbremez 08/11/2018 06:47PM
Re: ANTINOUS 2 Sept 1916 Michael Lowrey 09/12/2018 01:29PM
Re: ANTINOUS 2 Sept 1916 Josephbremez 09/12/2018 02:25PM
Re: ANTINOUS 2 Sept 1916 Oliver Lörscher 09/12/2018 06:50PM
Re: ANTINOUS 2 Sept 1916 Josephbremez 09/13/2018 08:55PM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  ******    **    **  **      **        **  ********  
 **    **   **   **   **  **  **        **  **     ** 
 **         **  **    **  **  **        **  **     ** 
 **   ****  *****     **  **  **        **  ********  
 **    **   **  **    **  **  **  **    **  **        
 **    **   **   **   **  **  **  **    **  **        
  ******    **    **   ***  ***    ******   **