WWI forum
World War One discussions.
Re: HMS G7
Posted by:
Simon S.
()
Date: August 03, 2019 03:19PM
Hi Clio,
UC 59 would be a better candidate because the mines were laid in mid 1918. I think UC 50 is a pretty long shot. Her mines were laid in 1917 and G 7 met his fate by the end of the war. We need the wreck position to be sure.
So Long,
Simon S.
UC 59 would be a better candidate because the mines were laid in mid 1918. I think UC 50 is a pretty long shot. Her mines were laid in 1917 and G 7 met his fate by the end of the war. We need the wreck position to be sure.
So Long,
Simon S.
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
HMS G7 | Clio | 08/02/2019 04:56AM |
Re: HMS G7 | Simon S. | 08/02/2019 02:45PM |
Re: HMS G7 | Clio | 08/02/2019 06:01PM |
Re: HMS G7 | Simon S. | 08/03/2019 03:19PM |
Re: HMS G7 | Clio | 08/07/2019 02:36PM |
Re: HMS G7 | Oliver Lörscher | 08/18/2019 05:05PM |
Re: HMS G7 | phil morgan | 08/19/2019 11:58AM |
Re: HMS G7 | phil morgan | 08/19/2019 12:32PM |
Re: HMS G7 | Urs Heßling | 08/19/2019 05:47PM |
Re: HMS G7 | Oliver Lörscher | 08/20/2019 06:24PM |