WWI forum  
World War One discussions. 
Re: HMS G7
Posted by: Oliver Lörscher ()
Date: August 20, 2019 06:24PM

Well, I would say, IF really an German submarine laid mine was the reason for G 7's loss, than it should be the field lait by U 78 on Sept. 27th, 1918.

Fields from UC 59 are at least positioned from 1°29,8'W or even farther West which seems to me to be outside Farnes Deep.

The field from U 78, consisting of 34 mines (which had no time-setting) are laid in an zig-zag-line from:

56°00’N-01°11’W
55°59’N-01°12’W
55°57’N-01°12’W
55°56’N-01°13’W
55°55’N-01°13’W
55°54’N-01°12’W

So U 78 should be the most likely candidate.

But please keep in mind, that in 1918 there are several loose mines adrift in the North Sea, both German and British submarines regularly refering to sightings of drifting mines.

Oliver

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
HMS G7 Clio 08/02/2019 04:56AM
Re: HMS G7 Simon S. 08/02/2019 02:45PM
Re: HMS G7 Clio 08/02/2019 06:01PM
Re: HMS G7 Simon S. 08/03/2019 03:19PM
Re: HMS G7 Clio 08/07/2019 02:36PM
Re: HMS G7 Oliver Lörscher 08/18/2019 05:05PM
Re: HMS G7 phil morgan 08/19/2019 11:58AM
Re: HMS G7 phil morgan 08/19/2019 12:32PM
Re: HMS G7 Urs Heßling 08/19/2019 05:47PM
Re: HMS G7 Oliver Lörscher 08/20/2019 06:24PM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********        **  **    **  **     **  **     ** 
 **              **   **  **   ***   ***  **     ** 
 **              **    ****    **** ****  **     ** 
 ******          **     **     ** *** **  **     ** 
 **        **    **     **     **     **   **   **  
 **        **    **     **     **     **    ** **   
 ********   ******      **     **     **     ***