General Discussions  
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII. 
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent
Posted by: kpp ()
Date: November 28, 2000 05:47PM

<HTML>Hi Fin,

you are completely right. But the problem was just that England knew that and began the war at a moment where the german navy was not ready.

A.H. thought that England would not begin a war because of the Poland question and told this to the leaders of the different parts of the Wehrmacht on August 22, 1939 on the Obersalzberg.

The memeorandum of Dönitz asking the 300 boats was made after this meeting only on August 28, 1939.

And Raeder wrote on September 3,1939 that the German Navy only would have opened a war against England at the end of 1944/45.

Even on September 7, 1939 Raeder and A.H. decided to limit the U-Bootwar and to hold back the Graf Spee and the Deutschland detecting that France had not will to fight and hoping that England would finally accept the new situation in the east.

So the war began at a moment that Germany was not ready and England saw that it was the last moment and perhaps the last occasion to begin it under favorable conditions.

So if Germany would have made a great armament effort earlier, which he couldn\'t because of his limitated production and raw-material capacities, England would have begun the war earlier too.

Nevertheless the Kriegsmarine tried to make the best of this unfavourable situation but had no optimistic feeling about the result.

</HTML>

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
Why Doenitz? Ying 11/28/2000 04:38AM
RE: Why Doenitz? Why Not.? Ted Armstrong 11/28/2000 07:17AM
RE: Why Doenitz? Why Not.? Joe Brennan 11/29/2000 08:11AM
RE: Why Doenitz? MPC 11/28/2000 09:35AM
RE: Why Doenitz? Fin Bonset 11/28/2000 12:51PM
RE: for Fin B Joe Brennan 11/29/2000 08:23AM
RE: Why Doenitz? kpp 11/28/2000 01:30PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Fin Bonset 11/28/2000 02:10PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Arthur 11/28/2000 02:59PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Fin Bonset 11/28/2000 03:22PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Arthur 11/29/2000 02:15PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Fin Bonset 11/29/2000 02:49PM
RE: Dont underestimate MPC 11/28/2000 03:24PM
RE: Dont underestimate Fin Bonset 11/28/2000 03:31PM
RE: Fin, I understand MPC 11/28/2000 11:05PM
RE: Fin, I understand Fin Bonset 11/29/2000 12:53PM
RE: dont forget the rule of 1/3 MPC 11/28/2000 11:15PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent kpp 11/28/2000 05:47PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Fin Bonset 11/28/2000 06:02PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent kpp 11/28/2000 06:59PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Fin Bonset 11/28/2000 07:01PM
Doenitz, 300 U-boats and grand strategy SuperKraut 12/03/2000 06:58PM
RE: Why Doenitz? Michael Lowrey 11/28/2000 02:43PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent kurt 11/28/2000 10:29PM
RE: Why Doenitz? Antonio Veiga 11/28/2000 10:56PM
RE: Why Doenitz? kpp 11/28/2000 11:01PM
RE: More information please MPC 11/28/2000 11:35PM
RE: More information please kpp 11/30/2000 09:40AM
RE: YING you better read this lot MPC 11/28/2000 11:21PM
RE: Why Doenitz? Ying 11/29/2000 04:30AM
RE: Why Doenitz? tony 11/29/2000 06:41PM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  ********  **     **  ********   **     ** 
 **           **     **     **  **     **  **     ** 
 **           **     **     **  **     **  **     ** 
 ******       **     **     **  **     **  ********* 
 **           **     **     **  **     **  **     ** 
 **           **     **     **  **     **  **     ** 
 ********     **      *******   ********   **     **