General Discussions  
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII. 
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent
Posted by: Fin Bonset ()
Date: November 28, 2000 06:02PM

<HTML>Hi kpp,

Thanks for that post, it makes complete sense and to my knowledge is true as I did a little more research today. I\'m surprised Doenitz asked for the 300 figure so late. But, no one in Germany could predict when or if England would engage in the war. I know for fact, like you pointed out, that Hitler thought the English would easily subject themselves to Nazi ideologies as he considered the English fellow Aryans. They were wrong of course (and this is where the British Bulldog Spirit came about, kudos to MPC for pointing that out). The same is with the Dutch. As I have just discovered from several former Dutch Waffen SS sites, the Dutch were considered and deemed more Nordic and Aryan pure than the Germans themselves in many cases (I guess per capita). Hitler showed a lot of mercy to the Dutch because he thought they would easily capitulate and subscribe to nazi ideology. They were wrong again. The Dutch resistance and anti-nazi mentality, although not as famous and large as that of the French, was very active and only very few Dutchmen subscribed to the beliefs (mostly NSBers).

The predictions were wrong on both sides. England did the right thing in declaring war at that stage. Probably the smartest move of the war.

Best regards to all,

Fin Bonset

</HTML>

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
Why Doenitz? Ying 11/28/2000 04:38AM
RE: Why Doenitz? Why Not.? Ted Armstrong 11/28/2000 07:17AM
RE: Why Doenitz? Why Not.? Joe Brennan 11/29/2000 08:11AM
RE: Why Doenitz? MPC 11/28/2000 09:35AM
RE: Why Doenitz? Fin Bonset 11/28/2000 12:51PM
RE: for Fin B Joe Brennan 11/29/2000 08:23AM
RE: Why Doenitz? kpp 11/28/2000 01:30PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Fin Bonset 11/28/2000 02:10PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Arthur 11/28/2000 02:59PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Fin Bonset 11/28/2000 03:22PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Arthur 11/29/2000 02:15PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Fin Bonset 11/29/2000 02:49PM
RE: Dont underestimate MPC 11/28/2000 03:24PM
RE: Dont underestimate Fin Bonset 11/28/2000 03:31PM
RE: Fin, I understand MPC 11/28/2000 11:05PM
RE: Fin, I understand Fin Bonset 11/29/2000 12:53PM
RE: dont forget the rule of 1/3 MPC 11/28/2000 11:15PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent kpp 11/28/2000 05:47PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Fin Bonset 11/28/2000 06:02PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent kpp 11/28/2000 06:59PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Fin Bonset 11/28/2000 07:01PM
Doenitz, 300 U-boats and grand strategy SuperKraut 12/03/2000 06:58PM
RE: Why Doenitz? Michael Lowrey 11/28/2000 02:43PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent kurt 11/28/2000 10:29PM
RE: Why Doenitz? Antonio Veiga 11/28/2000 10:56PM
RE: Why Doenitz? kpp 11/28/2000 11:01PM
RE: More information please MPC 11/28/2000 11:35PM
RE: More information please kpp 11/30/2000 09:40AM
RE: YING you better read this lot MPC 11/28/2000 11:21PM
RE: Why Doenitz? Ying 11/29/2000 04:30AM
RE: Why Doenitz? tony 11/29/2000 06:41PM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **              **  **    **  ********   **     ** 
 **              **  **   **   **     **   **   **  
 **              **  **  **    **     **    ** **   
 **              **  *****     **     **     ***    
 **        **    **  **  **    **     **    ** **   
 **        **    **  **   **   **     **   **   **  
 ********   ******   **    **  ********   **     **