General Discussions  
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII. 
RE: Why Doenitz? Why Not.?
Posted by: Joe Brennan ()
Date: November 29, 2000 08:11AM

<HTML>Hi Ted & Others Members here.!!

What you say, does sums it up very well about Doenitz.!

In regards what everyone else says about the man, I do believe
Doenitz may of have come closer in winning WWII, than any
other military learder of the Third Reich at that time.!
It was for the German Navy (Kreigsmarine), the events moved too
quickly. Its Commander-In-Chief, Grand Admiral Raeder, had been
assured by Hitler personally that war against Britain would not be
launched before 1944. Admiral Raeder took Hitler\'s word, that he
planned for a war, but only too slowly for the whole German Navy.
There was commanders in the German Navy including Doenitz,
begging for a immediate hugh build-up of the country\'s U-boat
force, enought to push Britain\'s Naval force back.
However, Raeder steered a middle course, but hostilities broke out
5 years before he expected war. The German naval build-up had
barely began, and Doenitz knew it very well, and his leadership was
then needed towards this new naval war with Britain.
In Sept 1939, the Germany only had 39-45 operational U-boats.
Of these only about 17 were ocean-going U-boats. Doenitz makes
it very clear that 300 boats were needed in order to win the war for
Germany,? but as we all know it never happen as Doenitz\'s wanted it.

Next month- December, marks 20 years on since Doenitz\'s death.
He is even today a much talked about-unrepentant military leader
of the modern world.

Cheers , Joe Brennan</HTML>

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
Why Doenitz? Ying 11/28/2000 04:38AM
RE: Why Doenitz? Why Not.? Ted Armstrong 11/28/2000 07:17AM
RE: Why Doenitz? Why Not.? Joe Brennan 11/29/2000 08:11AM
RE: Why Doenitz? MPC 11/28/2000 09:35AM
RE: Why Doenitz? Fin Bonset 11/28/2000 12:51PM
RE: for Fin B Joe Brennan 11/29/2000 08:23AM
RE: Why Doenitz? kpp 11/28/2000 01:30PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Fin Bonset 11/28/2000 02:10PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Arthur 11/28/2000 02:59PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Fin Bonset 11/28/2000 03:22PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Arthur 11/29/2000 02:15PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Fin Bonset 11/29/2000 02:49PM
RE: Dont underestimate MPC 11/28/2000 03:24PM
RE: Dont underestimate Fin Bonset 11/28/2000 03:31PM
RE: Fin, I understand MPC 11/28/2000 11:05PM
RE: Fin, I understand Fin Bonset 11/29/2000 12:53PM
RE: dont forget the rule of 1/3 MPC 11/28/2000 11:15PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent kpp 11/28/2000 05:47PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Fin Bonset 11/28/2000 06:02PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent kpp 11/28/2000 06:59PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent Fin Bonset 11/28/2000 07:01PM
Doenitz, 300 U-boats and grand strategy SuperKraut 12/03/2000 06:58PM
RE: Why Doenitz? Michael Lowrey 11/28/2000 02:43PM
RE: Doenitz, and an outcome tangent kurt 11/28/2000 10:29PM
RE: Why Doenitz? Antonio Veiga 11/28/2000 10:56PM
RE: Why Doenitz? kpp 11/28/2000 11:01PM
RE: More information please MPC 11/28/2000 11:35PM
RE: More information please kpp 11/30/2000 09:40AM
RE: YING you better read this lot MPC 11/28/2000 11:21PM
RE: Why Doenitz? Ying 11/29/2000 04:30AM
RE: Why Doenitz? tony 11/29/2000 06:41PM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  ******    **     **  ********  **     **  **      ** 
 **    **   **     **  **        **     **  **  **  ** 
 **         **     **  **        **     **  **  **  ** 
 **   ****  **     **  ******    *********  **  **  ** 
 **    **   **     **  **        **     **  **  **  ** 
 **    **   **     **  **        **     **  **  **  ** 
  ******     *******   ********  **     **   ***  ***