Re: RE: ship with unexplode torpedo
Posted by:
Natter
()
Date: January 28, 2016 08:06PM
It's perfectly plausible for a torpedo to penetrate the steel hull of a ship by just kinetic energy.
We (ie RNoN) "inheritated" over 1200 ex-german G7a(TI) torpedoes after the war, which went into our arsenal (it was actually kept in service - with several modifications - until 1999).
We had at least one well-known incident from the 70's (or early 80's) when an exercise torpedo malfunctioned and physically hit the targetvessel (an Oslo-class frigate), penetrating and lodging itself in the hull.
We (ie RNoN) "inheritated" over 1200 ex-german G7a(TI) torpedoes after the war, which went into our arsenal (it was actually kept in service - with several modifications - until 1999).
We had at least one well-known incident from the 70's (or early 80's) when an exercise torpedo malfunctioned and physically hit the targetvessel (an Oslo-class frigate), penetrating and lodging itself in the hull.
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
ship with unexplode torpedo | chong | 06/13/2001 08:10AM |
RE: ship with unexplode torpedo | Visje | 06/13/2001 12:16PM |
RE: ship with unexplode torpedo | kurt | 06/13/2001 08:04PM |
Re: RE: ship with unexplode torpedo | Natter | 01/28/2016 08:06PM |
RE: ship with unexplode torpedo | chong | 06/15/2001 10:39AM |
RE: ship with unexplode torpedo | Visje | 06/17/2001 10:15AM |
RE: ship with unexplode torpedo | kurt | 06/18/2001 01:35AM |
Re: RE: ship with unexplode torpedo | John Newman, Jr. | 12/05/2015 06:23PM |
Re: RE: ship with unexplode torpedo | Rainer | 12/11/2015 09:24PM |