General Discussions
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII.
RE: torpedos
Posted by:
Craig McLean
()
Date: December 07, 2000 10:31PM
<HTML>Very good question about quality, etc., of torps in the war! By the way, Yanks called them \"fish\" quite often, Germans \"eels\" I believe...I\'d be curious what the Japanese used as slang for a torpedo??
Anyway, no answer by me on reliability throughout the stages of the war, but thought this might be of interest....
A Professor Ramsey at Kansas State University told me once, that Americans and Germans rightfully decided to target cargo/merchant ships rather than warships as the backbones of Japan and England (both island nations) in order. Japanese doctrine, however, was for their subs to go after Allied warships...as more \"honorable\" targets.
In a very small, simple nutshell...stategic bombing of German and Japanese industrial targets did not bring either of those countries to their knees. Armies in the field had to be defeated to win the war. But the war at sea was different. Merchant shipping was indeed the best target for subs and U-boats...and their impact was felt by both the Allies in the Atlantic and by the Japanese in the Pacific. I\'m not very \"up\" on the war in the Pacific, but my general understanding is that Japanese shipping suffered grevious losses, especially to American subs there.
So that is a general discussion of strategy....which still leaves the good question about the torpedoes that had to do the work....
Best,
Craig
(By the way....today is National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day [for Dec. 7, 1941] in the US..!!)</HTML>
Anyway, no answer by me on reliability throughout the stages of the war, but thought this might be of interest....
A Professor Ramsey at Kansas State University told me once, that Americans and Germans rightfully decided to target cargo/merchant ships rather than warships as the backbones of Japan and England (both island nations) in order. Japanese doctrine, however, was for their subs to go after Allied warships...as more \"honorable\" targets.
In a very small, simple nutshell...stategic bombing of German and Japanese industrial targets did not bring either of those countries to their knees. Armies in the field had to be defeated to win the war. But the war at sea was different. Merchant shipping was indeed the best target for subs and U-boats...and their impact was felt by both the Allies in the Atlantic and by the Japanese in the Pacific. I\'m not very \"up\" on the war in the Pacific, but my general understanding is that Japanese shipping suffered grevious losses, especially to American subs there.
So that is a general discussion of strategy....which still leaves the good question about the torpedoes that had to do the work....
Best,
Craig
(By the way....today is National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day [for Dec. 7, 1941] in the US..!!)</HTML>
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
torpedos | tony | 12/07/2000 07:54PM |
RE: torpedos | Craig McLean | 12/07/2000 10:31PM |
RE: Japanese honor code and subs | kurt | 12/09/2000 11:30PM |
RE: Japanese honor code and subs | Roy Prince | 12/10/2000 12:36AM |
RE: Japanese honor code and subs | Steve Cooper | 12/11/2000 01:00PM |
RE: Japanese honor code and subs | kurt | 12/12/2000 03:15AM |
RE: torpedos | kpp | 12/07/2000 11:00PM |
RE: torpedos failures..? | Joe Brennan | 12/08/2000 02:21AM |
RE: torpedos failures..? | John R. | 12/08/2000 02:17PM |
RE: torpedo failures..? | j harvey | 12/08/2000 05:51PM |
RE: torpedo failures..? | John R. | 12/08/2000 06:03PM |
RE: torpedo failures..? | jharvey | 12/08/2000 07:22PM |
RE: torpedo failures..? | John R. | 12/08/2000 08:25PM |
RE: Torpedo Exploder Mods | Don Baker | 12/08/2000 07:52PM |
RE: Torpedo Exploder Mods | John R. | 12/08/2000 08:29PM |
RE: torpedo failures..? | John | 12/09/2000 05:50PM |
RE: torpedo failures..? | kurt | 12/09/2000 10:51PM |
Japanese torpedoes | kurt | 12/09/2000 11:07PM |