General Discussions
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII.
Re: U-1200
Posted by:
Rainer
()
Date: June 04, 2017 11:15AM
Hi Richard
The wreck of a type VIIC U-boat was discovered by Innes McCartney in position 50.02,7N, 02.01W on 1 June 1999. Its details are described from page 269 to 276 in his book "The Maritime Archaeology of a Modern Conflict" but the author believed the wreck to be U-772. However, further analyzing the details of the wreck it was positively identified as U-1200 by Axel Niestlé, the leading researcher of the U-boat fates.
I've read the report of the depth charge attacks carried out by the Castle class corvettes of Escort Group 30 south of Ireland during the night of 10/11 November 1944. The attacks were made on Asdic contacts only and brought air bubbles, large quantities of oil and some debris to the surface. Some oil and a petrol tin of Shell Mex pattern was recovered, but it was an insufficient amount of oil for analysis - it could also have come from the ships of a convoy that passed over the attack position during the hunt. So there is no evidence that a U-boat was present and the initial attribution of the loss of U-1200 to this attack shortly after the war is questionable.
Best regards
Rainer
Crew member of uboat.net
The wreck of a type VIIC U-boat was discovered by Innes McCartney in position 50.02,7N, 02.01W on 1 June 1999. Its details are described from page 269 to 276 in his book "The Maritime Archaeology of a Modern Conflict" but the author believed the wreck to be U-772. However, further analyzing the details of the wreck it was positively identified as U-1200 by Axel Niestlé, the leading researcher of the U-boat fates.
I've read the report of the depth charge attacks carried out by the Castle class corvettes of Escort Group 30 south of Ireland during the night of 10/11 November 1944. The attacks were made on Asdic contacts only and brought air bubbles, large quantities of oil and some debris to the surface. Some oil and a petrol tin of Shell Mex pattern was recovered, but it was an insufficient amount of oil for analysis - it could also have come from the ships of a convoy that passed over the attack position during the hunt. So there is no evidence that a U-boat was present and the initial attribution of the loss of U-1200 to this attack shortly after the war is questionable.
Best regards
Rainer
Crew member of uboat.net
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
U-1200 | Richard Sands | 06/01/2017 09:42AM |
Re: U-1200 | t-geronimo | 06/01/2017 11:58AM |
Re: U-1200 | jcrt | 06/02/2017 11:40AM |
Re: U-1200 | ARANTALES | 06/02/2017 04:55PM |
Re: U-1200 | jcrt | 06/02/2017 06:25PM |
Re: U-1200 | Rainer | 06/04/2017 11:15AM |