WWI forum  
World War One discussions. 

Pages: 123Next
Current Page: 1 of 3
Results 1 - 30 of 66
2 years ago
Nom Anor
Very interesting! But wasn't UC 66 sunk earlier by aircraft?
Forum: WWI forum
2 years ago
Nom Anor
I should add that, for example, there was an Austro-Hungarian U 3, and also a German one. In addition to that, the Germans also had a UB 3 and a UC 3, UC being the designation given to coastal minelaying boats.
Forum: WWI forum
2 years ago
Nom Anor
Hi Alan, The U 3 that "saw no service" and surrendered in 1918 was the German one, not the Austro-Hungarian! The Austro-Hungarian U 3 was indeed sunk in August 1915. It can indeed get confusing with WWI U boat numbers.
Forum: WWI forum
3 years ago
Nom Anor
Thank you, Michael. It must be a hell of a job to be able to keep track of all these very small sailing vessels, many with similar names, and sometimes no name at all!
Forum: WWI forum
3 years ago
Nom Anor
Hello everyone, In the book "Austro-Hungarian Submarines in WWI" by Jiri Novak, it's stated on pages-60-61 that, in late 1915(no exact date is given) U 17 destroyed a sailing vessel with her 37 mm gun. The sailing vessel tried to escape by sailing into shallow coastal waters, but the submarine made good shooting. Furthermore, on page-94 it is mentioned that, after Hermann Ri
Forum: WWI forum
3 years ago
Nom Anor
On 16 August 1915, U 24 shelled Whitehaven and damaged a naphtha works there. The repairs took four days to complete. There were no casualties.
Forum: WWI forum
4 years ago
Nom Anor
Thank you for your replies, mates.
Forum: WWI forum
4 years ago
Nom Anor
Hi all. On September 29, 1915, the French destroyer Branlebas was mined and sunk off Nieuport(near the Middelkerkebank according to Wrecksite) while on patrol. Do we know who laid the minefield responsible for this sinking? I thought it might be a UC-boat laid mine.
Forum: WWI forum
4 years ago
Nom Anor
Thank you both, Michael & Simon. So U 33 was much luckier than her sister U 34...
Forum: WWI forum
4 years ago
Nom Anor
Continuing this line of thought, when did U 33 return from the Mediterranean? Did she join the exodus from the Adriatic in October 1918, or had she alreadly left for home earlier in 1918?
Forum: WWI forum
4 years ago
Nom Anor
Simon and Michael, thank you both for your replies. Much appreciated.
Forum: WWI forum
4 years ago
Nom Anor
It says here that the British sailing Q-ship Sarah Colebrooke was badly damaged in action with a U-boat on June 3, 1917. Do we have any idea which U-boat this might be? "SARAH COLEBROOKE, Q-ship, 3 June 1917, English Channel - aliases include Balham, Bolham, Meryl (sc - serving as Bolham, ex-Sarah Colebrooke, operating as Worrynot of Littlehampton), special service/submarine decoy/Q
Forum: WWI forum
4 years ago
Nom Anor
Hello again. Do we have any indication which U-boat might be responsible for the attack on the British steamer City of Cambridge(which would later be sunk in 1917) on March 28, 1915? Also, according to the Official history of the British Merchant Navy, the ship sustained some damage from gunfire in this attack:
Forum: WWI forum
4 years ago
Nom Anor
Glad to be of help!
Forum: WWI forum
4 years ago
Nom Anor
Hello. At least two sources give a July 1916 date for U 48's capture of British steamer Pendennis, instead of August. Navalhistory.net says it happened on 8 July here: James Goldrick's book "After Jutland" also says(p.56) she was captured in July, but does not give an exact date.
Forum: WWI forum
5 years ago
Nom Anor
Thanks for the additional information. So that makes six U-boat encounters for Penshurst(that resulted in damage or destruction for one side or the other). Damn, what a record!
Forum: WWI forum
5 years ago
Nom Anor
Thank you for your swift response, Michael. This is the same Penshurst that sank both UB 19 and UB 37, I presume?
Forum: WWI forum
5 years ago
Nom Anor
Hello, Admiral Scheer mentions in his memoirs a fight between U 84 and a Q-ship that took place on 22 February 1917. U 84 was badly damaged and lucky to survive. An escort ship also joined the action later, of a type Germans called "Foxglove". Is it known which Q-ship was this? And the escort? Scheer mentions a few hits registered on the latter. Is that true?
Forum: WWI forum
5 years ago
Nom Anor
Slight correction: On the 2 November 1917 raid, 8 fishing trawlers were sunk, not 10. My mistake. The auxiliary cruiser K/Kronprinz Wilhelm was sunk by the destroyers Parker, Rocket, Trenchant, Rigorous, Sorceress, Ready and Rob Roy. The Frankfurt(158 grt) you mention is one of the eight trawlers sunk. The other seven were: Frisia, Emmy, Makrele, Julius Wieting, Seadler, Sonne and Walter. T
Forum: WWI forum
5 years ago
Nom Anor
The 2 November 1917 raid was a relatively small affair, British destroyers ventured into the Kattegat and sank the small auxiliary cruiser/Q-ship K/Kronprinz Wilhelm and ten fishing trawlers. The 17 November 1917 raid turned into the 2. Battle Of the Heligoland Bight. The British forces that directly went into action were: First Cruiser Squadron: Light battlecruisers Courageous(flag) and G
Forum: WWI forum
5 years ago
Nom Anor
Less than a day before the Armistice went into effect!
Forum: WWI forum
5 years ago
Nom Anor
Many thanks again. This information is very useful!
Forum: WWI forum
5 years ago
Nom Anor
I'm bumping this thread a little in case someone has information in regard to the mines that sank(i.e, who laid them?) British destroyers HMS Maori(7May 1915) and HMS Ariel & Vehement(2 August 1918).
Forum: WWI forum
5 years ago
Nom Anor
It was actually a mine laid by U-156, not 153. Torpedoes do not necessarily sink ships faster; ships hit by mines sometimes sink as fast, and torpedoed ships sometimes sink very slowly, or not at all.
Forum: WWI forum
5 years ago
Nom Anor
Thanks again for this information! Much appreciated.
Forum: WWI forum
5 years ago
Nom Anor
Thank you, Urs! Do you know which German torpedo boats were involved? And how many mines did they lay there? Thanks again. Any information is welcome.
Forum: WWI forum
5 years ago
Nom Anor
Thank you, this is useful, but doesn't seem to answer my questions.
Forum: WWI forum
5 years ago
Nom Anor
Greetings all. I know this question is not directly U-boat related, as none of the destroyers I'm about to mention seem to be lost on mines laid by U-boats. But I didn't know where else to ask this, and I know people here have studied WWI minefields and mining incidents extensively, so someone might know. If this is too much off-topic, please lock. Anyway, I'm interested to k
Forum: WWI forum
6 years ago
Nom Anor
Poor U 47! Thanks Chris, this is very useful information.
Forum: WWI forum
6 years ago
Nom Anor
Thanks again, mates. Much appreciated. I just checked: It seems that the confusion with U 35's status during the last days of the war owes its origin to very old sources. R.H. Gibson and Maurice Prendergast in their book "The German Submarine War 1914-1918" state that in November 1918 U 35 arrived at Barcelona(page-332 and 377 in my copy). As for the maintenance standards of
Forum: WWI forum
Pages: 123Next
Current Page: 1 of 3