Warship forum
A forum for the Allied Warships section.
Re: LCVPs
Posted by:
DanOdenweller
()
Date: April 24, 2007 07:55PM
LCVP's, like other U.S.Navy small craft did not have individual names. They were simply a boat number. Thus YFU-54 and LCU-1498, and your PA26-24.
PA26-24, which was the identification of the unit, represented the ship and boat number. As such, if lost, the replacement would still be PA26-24. Of course the two LCVP's would have individual numbers, so that LCV(P)42116 might be replaced by LCV(P)42117, again both would have been PA26-24.
Each boatbuilding establishment would be assigned a block of numbers, and then used them serially. As such, any given source should be serially numbered, but gaps between the blocks account for the skipped numbers.
Colberg has a website of ship and boat production, try Google for Colberg and see what comes up.
Dan B. Odenweller
PA26-24, which was the identification of the unit, represented the ship and boat number. As such, if lost, the replacement would still be PA26-24. Of course the two LCVP's would have individual numbers, so that LCV(P)42116 might be replaced by LCV(P)42117, again both would have been PA26-24.
Each boatbuilding establishment would be assigned a block of numbers, and then used them serially. As such, any given source should be serially numbered, but gaps between the blocks account for the skipped numbers.
Colberg has a website of ship and boat production, try Google for Colberg and see what comes up.
Dan B. Odenweller
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
LCVPs | KeithLangley2 | 04/24/2007 12:17PM |
Re: LCVPs | DanOdenweller | 04/24/2007 07:55PM |
Re: LCVPs | DanOdenweller | 04/24/2007 08:04PM |
Re: LCVPs | Keith Langley2 | 04/25/2007 10:29PM |
Re: LCVPs | Richard Spiese | 09/08/2009 07:39PM |
Re: LCVPs | DanOdenweller | 09/10/2009 10:59AM |
Re: LCVPs | Walter Schmidt | 04/26/2007 10:07PM |
Re: LCVPs | ROBERT M. | 07/30/2007 06:49AM |