WWI forum
World War One discussions.
Re: identify German submarine sunken Mar 10, 1918
Posted by:
Michael Lowrey
()
Date: October 06, 2006 05:09AM
Thomas,
UB 58 was sunk on that date, but not at that location. Damant's divers would eventually discover the wreck of UB 58 some months laer, but misdescribed it. (The wreck has been relocated and positively identified in recent years).
The trawler attack at 50.24N 0.13.10W may refer to a French attack that could possibly have sunk UB 54 (or not). If not, it's a false claim.
Best wishes,
Michael
UB 58 was sunk on that date, but not at that location. Damant's divers would eventually discover the wreck of UB 58 some months laer, but misdescribed it. (The wreck has been relocated and positively identified in recent years).
The trawler attack at 50.24N 0.13.10W may refer to a French attack that could possibly have sunk UB 54 (or not). If not, it's a false claim.
Best wishes,
Michael
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
identify German submarine sunken Mar 10, 1918 | Thomas Krispin | 10/05/2006 10:01AM |
Re: identify German submarine sunken Mar 10, 1918 | Michael Lowrey | 10/06/2006 05:09AM |
Re: identify German submarine sunken Mar 10, 1918 | Thomas Krispin | 10/06/2006 07:08AM |
Re: identify German submarine sunken Mar 10, 1918 | Burkhard Koop | 10/27/2006 09:29PM |