WWI forum
World War One discussions.
Re: U-boats vs HM Submarines
Posted by:
Oliver Lörscher
()
Date: June 04, 2012 06:42PM
Hi Nom Anor,
the reported attack against B 3 (Chisholm) was bogus, no U-Boat in that area.
As for C 4:
26.09.1917 position was 50°02‘N-02°04‘W at 19:30h and her target MIGHT have been UB 40 (Howaldt), but I haven't seen UB 40's KTB to confirm the "dud-story".
27.03.1918 position was 50°28‘N-00°14‘E at 00:33h and her target was UB 59 (Wassner) who didn't noticed this attacked - so in that case no dud.
Oliver
the reported attack against B 3 (Chisholm) was bogus, no U-Boat in that area.
As for C 4:
26.09.1917 position was 50°02‘N-02°04‘W at 19:30h and her target MIGHT have been UB 40 (Howaldt), but I haven't seen UB 40's KTB to confirm the "dud-story".
27.03.1918 position was 50°28‘N-00°14‘E at 00:33h and her target was UB 59 (Wassner) who didn't noticed this attacked - so in that case no dud.
Oliver
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
U-boats vs HM Submarines | Nom Anor | 06/04/2012 02:07AM |
Re: U-boats vs HM Submarines | Oliver Lörscher | 06/04/2012 06:42PM |
Re: U-boats vs HM Submarines | Nom Anor | 06/05/2012 03:06AM |