General Discussions
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII.
RE: bunker/zelle? and displacement
Posted by:
J.T. McDaniel
()
Date: June 11, 2001 11:17PM
<HTML>Flooding an external ballast tank would cause the boat to go down because, while the boat\'s actual weight remains the same, the displacement, minus the air in the external tanks, is no longer sufficient to keep the boat afloat. An example: take a metal cylinder and note that it floats. Now, attach extra weight in the form of open-bottomed outrigger tanks that have no inherent buoyancy. (They\'re open at the bottom, so it\'s essentially trying to float a flat sheet of metal held vertically.) The open-bottomed tanks add a sufficient mass to the cylinder to make it negatively buoyant, but they hold enough air to counteract their extra weight. Now open vents in the top of the tanks, let the air out, and the cylinder sinks.
Theoretically, if you could arrange things so that the saddle tanks could be jetisoned in an emergency, the rest of the boat should pop to the surface.
So it doesn\'t really require internal tanks. Those would be used mainly for trimming the boat, except for the safety tank, which is always kept full unless the conning tower floods, when it would be pumped out to compensate. (Presuming the boat involved has its attack centre in the tower, which not all do.)
It might also be noted that U-boat command recommended rather strongly against actually flooding to the point of negative buoyancy, since it was potentially dangerous. The recommendation was to trim to a slight positive buoyancy and use the forward motion of the boat working on the planes to maintain depth.
J.T. McDaniel</HTML>
Theoretically, if you could arrange things so that the saddle tanks could be jetisoned in an emergency, the rest of the boat should pop to the surface.
So it doesn\'t really require internal tanks. Those would be used mainly for trimming the boat, except for the safety tank, which is always kept full unless the conning tower floods, when it would be pumped out to compensate. (Presuming the boat involved has its attack centre in the tower, which not all do.)
It might also be noted that U-boat command recommended rather strongly against actually flooding to the point of negative buoyancy, since it was potentially dangerous. The recommendation was to trim to a slight positive buoyancy and use the forward motion of the boat working on the planes to maintain depth.
J.T. McDaniel</HTML>
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
bunker/zelle? and displacement | Leif... | 06/08/2001 03:34PM |
RE: bunker/zelle? and displacement | Werner Frank | 06/08/2001 05:50PM |
RE: bunker/zelle? and displacement | kpp | 06/09/2001 05:59AM |
RE: bunker/zelle? and displacement | Leif... | 06/11/2001 07:23AM |
RE: bunker/zelle? and displacement | J.T. McDaniel | 06/11/2001 11:17PM |