RE: U-556 Configuration and Paint Scheme
Posted by:
Raymond Groothuizen
()
Date: February 20, 2001 01:14PM
Hello Ranier,
Thank you very much for the info! It was the best possible combination, as it is the standard configuration for the Artitec sub I bought. (Well, not sure about venturi)
May inquire as to your source for this info? Are there photographs/ indications of emblems, etc...
While I have some experience modelling surface ships, this is my first sub model, and I am unfamiliar with the standard marking schemes, etc. (size/placement/style of ID numbers etc), ad I have found this site a great resource!!
Raymond
Thank you very much for the info! It was the best possible combination, as it is the standard configuration for the Artitec sub I bought. (Well, not sure about venturi)
May inquire as to your source for this info? Are there photographs/ indications of emblems, etc...
While I have some experience modelling surface ships, this is my first sub model, and I am unfamiliar with the standard marking schemes, etc. (size/placement/style of ID numbers etc), ad I have found this site a great resource!!
Raymond
| Subject | Written By | Posted |
|---|---|---|
U-556 Configuration and Paint Scheme
|
Raymond Groothuizen | 02/19/2001 01:48PM |
|
RE: U-556 Configuration and Paint Scheme
|
Rainer Bruns | 02/20/2001 03:17AM |
|
RE: U-556 Configuration and Paint Scheme
|
Raymond Groothuizen | 02/20/2001 01:14PM |
|
RE: U-556 Configuration and Paint Scheme
|
Rainer Bruns | 02/20/2001 02:32PM |
|
RE: U-556 Configuration and Paint Scheme
|
Raymond Groothuizen | 02/22/2001 01:49PM |
|
RE: U-556 Configuration and Paint Scheme
|
Rainer Bruns | 02/22/2001 05:09PM |
|
RE: U-556 Configuration and Paint Scheme
|
Raymond | 02/23/2001 02:09PM |