Re: Best Sub of WW2
Posted by:
Innes McCartney
()
Date: January 28, 2002 09:34PM
What about the Surcouf?? 
Interestingly I have been reading the technical assesments of the Type XXI which were made before Operation Deadlight.
Basically they state that while the design was good the build quality was dangerously if suicidally poor. Even simple things like valves and taps were made of such poor quality metal, that they were considered very unsafe by the RN.
Innes
Interestingly I have been reading the technical assesments of the Type XXI which were made before Operation Deadlight.
Basically they state that while the design was good the build quality was dangerously if suicidally poor. Even simple things like valves and taps were made of such poor quality metal, that they were considered very unsafe by the RN.
Innes
| Subject | Written By | Posted |
|---|---|---|
Best Sub of WW2
|
Gian Schoeman | 01/09/2002 11:17AM |
|
Re: Best Sub of WW2
|
kurt | 01/09/2002 01:27PM |
|
Re: Best Sub of WW2
|
walter M | 01/09/2002 07:29PM |
|
Re: Best Sub of WW2
|
kurt | 01/09/2002 10:45PM |
|
Re: Best Sub of WW2
|
J.T. McDaniel | 01/10/2002 04:06AM |
|
Re: Best Sub of WW2
|
Gian Schoeman | 01/10/2002 07:48AM |
|
Re: Best Sub of WW2
|
Innes McCartney | 01/28/2002 09:34PM |
|
Re: Best Sub of WW2
|
Rainer Bruns | 01/30/2002 02:10PM |