Re: Tactical depth decisions
Posted by: ACR ()
Date: November 24, 2009 01:14AM

i think it is true that the deeper you can go the more chance you have to survive a depth charge attack. all historical info i have read confirm this. from a physical and tactical point of view going deep reduces the lethal range of a depth charge becuase the big water pressure reduces the shock wave that is dropped against the hull of the boat. of course- the hull itself is in great tension by the water pressure. but that seems to be more than equalized by the reduced shock wave of the bomb in deep water. the second argument ist that especially in the first years of the war german uboats were able to dive much more depper that the allied forces believed and so they dropped their charges at relative shallow depths with no effect to a deep dived boat. third is that at deep dive you have more time to outmanouver the charge in relation between the point it is hit and it has sunk to a determined depth and explodes.

of course- a direct or nearly direct hit with a depth charge is a sure kill at whatever depth the boat is, no question.



Subject Written By Posted
Schnee Organ Karloin 09/18/2005 11:24AM
Re: Schnee Organ Rainer Bruns 09/18/2005 02:36PM
Re: Schnee Organ Karloin 09/18/2005 07:23PM
Re: Schnee Organ Rainer Bruns 09/18/2005 09:43PM
Tactical depth decisions Karloin 09/18/2005 10:30PM
Re: Tactical depth decisions Bronzewing 05/11/2009 07:16PM
Re: Tactical depth decisions Seeker 05/23/2009 08:40PM
Re: Tactical depth decisions Don Prince 05/24/2009 12:14AM
Re: Tactical depth decisions Seeker 05/24/2009 08:25PM
Re: Tactical depth decisions ThomasHorton 06/03/2009 04:06PM
Re: Tactical depth decisions ROBERT M. 06/04/2009 07:56AM
Re: Tactical depth decisions Don Prince 06/06/2009 02:01AM
Re: Tactical depth decisions gebhart 10/08/2009 03:25PM
Re: Tactical depth decisions ACR 11/24/2009 01:14AM
Re: Tactical depth decisions rhokane 07/06/2010 11:25PM