Re: Anthipi vs UC14
Posted by:
Oliver Lörscher
()
Date: December 22, 2006 05:46AM
Hi Capo, Yves and everyone,
ANTHIPI was no U-Boat-related victim.
In San Giovanni di Medua area there are no mines laid by UC 14 or UC 12 nor was there any attack by an german or austrian U-Boat, so ANTHIPI should have hit an mine laid by austrian torpedo-boats or possibliy also an mine from an italian defensive minefield !
The italian steamer BRINDISI which sank on 06.01.1916 for example (sometimes also claimed to be UC 12's victim) sank on an italien defensive mine off San Giovanni.
Oliver
ANTHIPI was no U-Boat-related victim.
In San Giovanni di Medua area there are no mines laid by UC 14 or UC 12 nor was there any attack by an german or austrian U-Boat, so ANTHIPI should have hit an mine laid by austrian torpedo-boats or possibliy also an mine from an italian defensive minefield !
The italian steamer BRINDISI which sank on 06.01.1916 for example (sometimes also claimed to be UC 12's victim) sank on an italien defensive mine off San Giovanni.
Oliver
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
Anthipi vs UC14 | Capo | 12/20/2006 10:37PM |
Re: Anthipi vs UC14 | Yves D | 12/21/2006 07:42AM |
Re: Anthipi vs UC14 | Yves D | 12/21/2006 07:51AM |
Re: Anthipi vs UC14 | BrianV | 12/21/2006 01:16PM |
Re: Anthipi vs UC14 | Yves D | 12/21/2006 05:13PM |
Re: Anthipi vs UC14 | Oliver Lörscher | 12/22/2006 05:46AM |
Re: Anthipi vs UC14 | Yves D | 12/22/2006 08:04AM |
Re: Anthipi vs UC14 | Yves D | 12/22/2006 08:39AM |
Re: Anthipi vs UC14 | capo | 12/23/2006 12:43AM |
Re: Anthipi vs UC14 | capo | 12/23/2006 01:06AM |
Re: Anthipi vs UC14 | Oliver Lörscher | 12/23/2006 07:48PM |
Re: Anthipi vs UC14 | capo | 12/24/2006 01:23AM |