RE: type IX better than VII???
Posted by:
Dietzsch
()
Date: March 16, 2001 09:39AM
<HTML>Oops, never finished my reasoning there. I should have added:
So, yes, the IX must have been a better ship, even if she was harder to handle. Although I suspect that with the right training (also a big issue, later in the war, having its own impact on U-Boat effectivity. Just imagine Prien, Kretschmer and the likes at the rudder of a XXI. Brrrr.) the U-Boat men would have experienced her as \'different\' rather than \'more difficult\'.</HTML>
So, yes, the IX must have been a better ship, even if she was harder to handle. Although I suspect that with the right training (also a big issue, later in the war, having its own impact on U-Boat effectivity. Just imagine Prien, Kretschmer and the likes at the rudder of a XXI. Brrrr.) the U-Boat men would have experienced her as \'different\' rather than \'more difficult\'.</HTML>
| Subject | Written By | Posted |
|---|---|---|
type IX better than VII???
|
Lars | 03/15/2001 12:57PM |
|
RE: type IX better than VII???
|
Dietzsch | 03/15/2001 04:07PM |
|
RE: type IX better than VII???
|
Rainer Bruns | 03/15/2001 05:52PM |
|
RE: type IX better than VII???
|
2000 | 03/15/2001 07:35PM |
|
RE: type IX better than VII???
|
Dietzsch | 03/16/2001 09:39AM |
|
RE: type IX better than VII???
|
Rainer Bruns | 03/16/2001 01:52PM |
|
RE: type IX better than VII???
|
zach | 03/15/2001 10:38PM |
RE ??
|
Antonio Veiga | 03/16/2001 09:22PM |
|
type IX and VII
|
kurt | 03/16/2001 10:09PM |
|
RE: type IX and VII
|
Rainer Bruns | 03/17/2001 02:24AM |
|
RE: type IX better than VII???
|
Stewart | 03/16/2001 10:59PM |
|
RE: type IX better than VII???
|
David Jones | 03/18/2001 09:41PM |
|
RE: type IX better than VII???
|
Rainer Bruns | 03/19/2001 03:07AM |
|
RE: type IX better than VII???
|
lars | 03/19/2001 08:34AM |