RE: Odd coincidence!
Posted by:
Rainer Bruns
()
Date: June 14, 2001 09:19PM
<HTML>Ola Antonio,
I always liked that painting, but the narration indicates the victim to be U461. That might have been the intended depiction by the artist. The boat, however, looks like a IXc not like a XIV. A XIV would be much fatter, without a 10.5 on the foredeck and added flak in a lower wintergarden. Any thoughts? Rgds, RB</HTML>
I always liked that painting, but the narration indicates the victim to be U461. That might have been the intended depiction by the artist. The boat, however, looks like a IXc not like a XIV. A XIV would be much fatter, without a 10.5 on the foredeck and added flak in a lower wintergarden. Any thoughts? Rgds, RB</HTML>
| Subject | Written By | Posted |
|---|---|---|
Odd coincidence!
|
Tim | 06/14/2001 03:03AM |
|
RE: Odd coincidence!
|
Walter M. | 06/14/2001 09:26AM |
|
RE: Odd coincidence!
|
Antonio Veiga | 06/14/2001 07:53PM |
|
RE: Odd coincidence!
|
Rainer Bruns | 06/14/2001 09:19PM |
|
RE: Odd coincidence!
|
Joe Brennan | 06/15/2001 09:46AM |
|
RE: Odd coincidence!
|
Antonio Veiga | 06/17/2001 06:50PM |
|
RE: Odd coincidence!
|
Rainer Bruns | 06/17/2001 07:14PM |
|
RE: Odd coincidence!
|
Tim | 06/16/2001 02:42AM |