Re: type XXI
Posted by:
Cape Crusader
()
Date: April 20, 2014 10:12AM
This is grossly unfair, no ?
Surely it is unacceptable to criticise an allegedly inaccurate or misleading or incomplete article in a public forum and then follow up with a private message.
Bad form.
Present your evidence publicly, and let forum contributors decide on your accuracy or the accuracy of your sources.
Surely it is unacceptable to criticise an allegedly inaccurate or misleading or incomplete article in a public forum and then follow up with a private message.
Bad form.
Present your evidence publicly, and let forum contributors decide on your accuracy or the accuracy of your sources.
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
type XXI | jcrt | 03/11/2014 01:58PM |
Re: type XXI | vito | 03/12/2014 09:54AM |
Re: type XXI | jcrt | 03/12/2014 09:32PM |
Re: type XXI | Ã…kerberg | 04/17/2014 03:45PM |
Re: type XXI | jcrt | 04/18/2014 01:34PM |
Re: type XXI | Derek Waller | 04/18/2014 02:20PM |
Re: type XXI | jcrt | 04/19/2014 07:28AM |
Re: type XXI | Cape Crusader | 04/20/2014 10:12AM |
Re: type XXI | jcrt | 04/20/2014 10:32AM |
Re: type XXI | Derek Waller | 04/20/2014 11:04AM |