Well, this discrepancy is already in the original re-assessment from 2007 - never noticed that the position listed for wreck No. 3 is a bit different from that listed in the fates at the end of the article. However, the latter is the one that fits the position on the map. Seems the first one was an error that was corrected in the lastest publications by Axel Niestlé and Innes McCarthy.

Best regards
Rainer

Crew member of uboat.net