Re: Why "U-571"
Posted by:
ROBERT M.
()
Date: December 20, 2005 06:23AM
Neil:
We're all fortunate they didn't use SSN-571......
Regards,
ROBERT M.
We're all fortunate they didn't use SSN-571......
Regards,
ROBERT M.
| Subject | Written By | Posted |
|---|---|---|
Why "U-571"
|
Neil A | 12/20/2005 01:27AM |
|
Re: Why "U-571"
|
ROBERT M. | 12/20/2005 06:23AM |
|
Re: Why "U-571"
|
Dougie | 12/23/2005 10:10PM |
|
Re: Why "U-571"
|
Aibek Satylkanov | 01/04/2006 05:19AM |
|
Re: Why "U-571"
|
ROBERT M. | 01/04/2006 06:48AM |
|
Re: Why "U-571"
|
annox | 01/30/2006 05:26AM |
|
Re: Why "U-571"
|
Meg Rosenfeld | 02/01/2006 07:30AM |
|
Re: Why "U-571"
|
kurt | 01/05/2006 05:03PM |
|
Re: Why "U-571"
|
Barry Scully | 03/06/2006 11:38PM |
|
Re: Why "U-571"
|
Peter E | 04/08/2006 08:03PM |
|
Re: Why "U-571"
|
ROBERT M. | 03/07/2006 08:19AM |