General Discussions
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII.
RE: Okay, let\\\'s settle this matter once and for
Posted by:
Rainer Bruns
()
Date: March 07, 2001 03:37PM
<HTML>Hi Frank,
Your comments above gave pause for thought. The matter of fact manner of your description re the \"shredding\" of dead Iraqis is astounding news to me. I thought with the absence to the draft the USArmy became more professional than a looting mob. To me (and I suspect to many others) there is a huge difference between picking up a discarded souvenir from a battlefield and hacking off a finger of a dead enemy soldier. The next step (not a large one) would be to rape and pillage the civilian population, while one is at it. According to your description I guess the basic attitude of chivalry towards the vanqished is not encouraged by USArmy leadership.
Anyone who knowingly obtains such ill gotten items second hand for collections, is not noticably higher in my esteem than \"grave robbers\".
I am not quite sure, what you intended to convey in your last two sentences, but I disagree emphatically. Just as yours, dissenters\' rights to sound off should not be abridged, even if negative, as long as reasonable manners are observed.
Rgds, RB</HTML>
Your comments above gave pause for thought. The matter of fact manner of your description re the \"shredding\" of dead Iraqis is astounding news to me. I thought with the absence to the draft the USArmy became more professional than a looting mob. To me (and I suspect to many others) there is a huge difference between picking up a discarded souvenir from a battlefield and hacking off a finger of a dead enemy soldier. The next step (not a large one) would be to rape and pillage the civilian population, while one is at it. According to your description I guess the basic attitude of chivalry towards the vanqished is not encouraged by USArmy leadership.
Anyone who knowingly obtains such ill gotten items second hand for collections, is not noticably higher in my esteem than \"grave robbers\".
I am not quite sure, what you intended to convey in your last two sentences, but I disagree emphatically. Just as yours, dissenters\' rights to sound off should not be abridged, even if negative, as long as reasonable manners are observed.
Rgds, RB</HTML>