General Discussions
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII.
RE: 200\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'??
Posted by:
John Griffiths
()
Date: June 20, 2001 05:33PM
<HTML>JD,
>>Being a crewman on a P3 Orion and being in countless exercises, and given conditions it\'s easy. They\'re not behind a wall! Can you see 200\' in the fog? Many times you can. The fact remains most u-boats were sunk by aircraft, no matter what the damned depth. I am an aviation ordnanceman. I\'ve set thousands of depth charges, mines, loaded bombs, zuni rockets, 20MM, shrike, sidewinders, walleyes, napalm, CBU\'s, DST\'s, chaff, and any other thing you can think of. Also, alot depends on What you are looking for. Look for your keys, you pass many things, you\'re looking for your damned keys. Look for subs, you\'ll find \'em. What will fool you are some biologicals, like whales. <<
No-one is knocking your experience but the crates they flew in WW2 were nowhere near as advanced as the Orion! Neither, for that matter, were the weapons.
The modern depth charges are far advanced from the basic kit that was fitted in WW2 - so that\'s not a fair comparison! More boats were sunk on the surface than were ever sunk at depth by an aircraft!
Can you see 200\' in fog? Aye - with radar! :-) Seriously, the old eyeball Mark 1 played many tricks on many people at many times. I am not doubting you could see a sub at 200 feet from half a mile up in the sky but - and I have to stress BUT - you\'d have to be extremely lucky. Extremely.
Carrots in the mess before fly off?
Then again, you naval aviatrixs have always been known to believe you\'re the best - and that is meant as a joke!
Aye,
John</HTML>
>>Being a crewman on a P3 Orion and being in countless exercises, and given conditions it\'s easy. They\'re not behind a wall! Can you see 200\' in the fog? Many times you can. The fact remains most u-boats were sunk by aircraft, no matter what the damned depth. I am an aviation ordnanceman. I\'ve set thousands of depth charges, mines, loaded bombs, zuni rockets, 20MM, shrike, sidewinders, walleyes, napalm, CBU\'s, DST\'s, chaff, and any other thing you can think of. Also, alot depends on What you are looking for. Look for your keys, you pass many things, you\'re looking for your damned keys. Look for subs, you\'ll find \'em. What will fool you are some biologicals, like whales. <<
No-one is knocking your experience but the crates they flew in WW2 were nowhere near as advanced as the Orion! Neither, for that matter, were the weapons.
The modern depth charges are far advanced from the basic kit that was fitted in WW2 - so that\'s not a fair comparison! More boats were sunk on the surface than were ever sunk at depth by an aircraft!
Can you see 200\' in fog? Aye - with radar! :-) Seriously, the old eyeball Mark 1 played many tricks on many people at many times. I am not doubting you could see a sub at 200 feet from half a mile up in the sky but - and I have to stress BUT - you\'d have to be extremely lucky. Extremely.
Carrots in the mess before fly off?
Then again, you naval aviatrixs have always been known to believe you\'re the best - and that is meant as a joke!
Aye,
John</HTML>
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
Crews | JD Thomas, USN (ret) | 06/19/2001 12:16AM |
RE: Crews | Roy Prince | 06/19/2001 01:40AM |
RE:200ft..? | Ted Armstrong | 06/19/2001 07:40AM |
RE:200ft..? | JD Thomas | 06/19/2001 11:28AM |
where and when | ray schwartz | 06/19/2001 02:13PM |
RE: where and when | Rainer Bruns | 06/19/2001 02:53PM |
RE: where and when | jd thomas | 06/19/2001 03:42PM |
RE: where and when | Tim | 06/19/2001 10:58PM |
U-boat vs A/C | Tim | 06/20/2001 10:44PM |
RE: U-boat vs A/C | Tim | 06/21/2001 12:25AM |
RE: where and when | Tim | 06/19/2001 11:04PM |
RE: where and when | JD Thomas | 06/19/2001 03:00PM |
RE: where and when | JD Thomas | 06/19/2001 03:01PM |
RE: 200\'?? | Rainer Bruns | 06/19/2001 01:24PM |
RE: 200\\\'?? | JD Thomas | 06/19/2001 02:58PM |
RE: 200\\\\\\\'?? | Rainer Bruns | 06/19/2001 03:19PM |
RE: 200\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'?? | John Griffiths | 06/19/2001 03:40PM |
RE: 200\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'?? | jdthomas | 06/19/2001 03:51PM |
RE: 200\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'?? | Jim | 06/19/2001 04:02PM |
RE: 200\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ | JD Thomas | 06/20/2001 09:03PM |
RE: 200\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'?? | Rainer Bruns | 06/19/2001 04:41PM |
RE: 200\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ | JD Thomas | 06/20/2001 09:14PM |
RE: 200 | Rainer Bruns | 06/21/2001 12:38AM |
RE: 200\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'?? | John Griffiths | 06/20/2001 05:33PM |
200 ft is too deep | kurt | 06/19/2001 05:54PM |
RE: 200 ft is too deep | J.T. McDaniel | 06/20/2001 12:09AM |