General Discussions  
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII. 
RE: 200\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Posted by: JD Thomas ()
Date: June 20, 2001 09:14PM

<HTML>I don\'t discount anyone\'s intelligence or experience. However, anyone that expresses themselves rudely and anonymously to me is, in my and most peoples opinion, a coward. In fact, the only point I have tried to make is that anti-sub warfare was far more advanced in \'45 than a lot of folks realize, and that in fact the German U-Boat service had the highest attrition rate of any branch of their military. That is indisputable fact. The United States literally engorged men, food, fuel, equipment and anything else to Britain and our allies. We did not lose ONE troop ship, not one.

Rainer Bruns wrote:
-------------------------------
Hi JD,
Would you care to take another try addressing points and questions in my last post to you?
Your experience in ordnance during the last couple decades does not disqualify you from commenting here, but is not neccessarily germain to the way ASW was conducted from the cockpit of an Avenger prior to landing again on his jeep-carrier in WW2. Yes, MAD was in it\\\'s infantcy then.
We appreciate the benefit of your experiences, but please don\\\'t assume, that ALL of us here at this forum just crawled out from under a rock. (Some, we meet here, might have :-)) There are some serious researchers here and, yes, there is also quite a bit of relevant experience represented here as well. Rgds, RB</HTML>

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
Crews JD Thomas, USN (ret) 06/19/2001 12:16AM
RE: Crews Roy Prince 06/19/2001 01:40AM
RE:200ft..? Ted Armstrong 06/19/2001 07:40AM
RE:200ft..? JD Thomas 06/19/2001 11:28AM
where and when ray schwartz 06/19/2001 02:13PM
RE: where and when Rainer Bruns 06/19/2001 02:53PM
RE: where and when jd thomas 06/19/2001 03:42PM
RE: where and when Tim 06/19/2001 10:58PM
U-boat vs A/C Tim 06/20/2001 10:44PM
RE: U-boat vs A/C Tim 06/21/2001 12:25AM
RE: where and when Tim 06/19/2001 11:04PM
RE: where and when JD Thomas 06/19/2001 03:00PM
RE: where and when JD Thomas 06/19/2001 03:01PM
RE: 200\'?? Rainer Bruns 06/19/2001 01:24PM
RE: 200\\\'?? JD Thomas 06/19/2001 02:58PM
RE: 200\\\\\\\'?? Rainer Bruns 06/19/2001 03:19PM
RE: 200\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'?? John Griffiths 06/19/2001 03:40PM
RE: 200\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'?? jdthomas 06/19/2001 03:51PM
RE: 200\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'?? Jim 06/19/2001 04:02PM
RE: 200\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ JD Thomas 06/20/2001 09:03PM
RE: 200\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'?? Rainer Bruns 06/19/2001 04:41PM
RE: 200\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ JD Thomas 06/20/2001 09:14PM
RE: 200 Rainer Bruns 06/21/2001 12:38AM
RE: 200\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'?? John Griffiths 06/20/2001 05:33PM
200 ft is too deep kurt 06/19/2001 05:54PM
RE: 200 ft is too deep J.T. McDaniel 06/20/2001 12:09AM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  ********  ********  **     **  **    ** 
  **   **   **        **        ***   ***  ***   ** 
   ** **    **        **        **** ****  ****  ** 
    ***     ******    ******    ** *** **  ** ** ** 
   ** **    **        **        **     **  **  **** 
  **   **   **        **        **     **  **   *** 
 **     **  ********  ********  **     **  **    **