RE: submerged targets
Posted by:
Rainer Bruns
()
Date: November 05, 2000 04:45PM
Hi Andrew,
If they are both at periscope depth, having loacated each other roughly by sound, firing blindly hit probability would be poor. After seeing each other's scope, Hit probability would increase dramatically, - however, then it is not a blind shot anymore.
By the way: "historical veracity" mentioned in conjunction of the flick U571 is an oximoron. :-) RB
If they are both at periscope depth, having loacated each other roughly by sound, firing blindly hit probability would be poor. After seeing each other's scope, Hit probability would increase dramatically, - however, then it is not a blind shot anymore.
By the way: "historical veracity" mentioned in conjunction of the flick U571 is an oximoron. :-) RB
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
submerged targets | Piet Stein | 11/02/2000 08:56AM |
RE: submerged targets | Antonio Veiga | 11/02/2000 08:07PM |
RE: submerged targets | David W | 11/03/2000 01:42AM |
RE: submerged targets | Steve Cooper | 11/03/2000 01:33PM |
RE: submerged targets | kurt | 11/03/2000 09:49PM |
Re: RE: submerged targets | Natter | 08/27/2011 04:19PM |
Re: RE: submerged targets | Natter | 03/23/2013 10:37PM |
RE: submerged targets | Andrew Hetherington | 11/05/2000 03:27PM |
RE: submerged targets | Rainer Bruns | 11/05/2000 04:45PM |
RE: submerged targets | Jerry Pope | 11/06/2000 01:23PM |
RE: submerged targets | Kurt | 11/21/2000 05:56PM |
RE: submerged targets | bernard zimmermann | 11/16/2000 01:22PM |
RE: submerged targets | Rainer Bruns | 11/16/2000 01:35PM |
RE: submerged targets | Richard Mickle | 11/16/2000 03:13PM |
RE: submerged targets | Rich Mickle | 11/16/2000 03:23PM |
RE: submerged targets | Antonio Veiga | 11/16/2000 10:08PM |
RE: submerged targets | Rich Mickle | 11/17/2000 10:40AM |
RE: submerged targets | Anders Wingren | 11/20/2000 06:17PM |