RE: submerged targets
Posted by:
Kurt
()
Date: November 21, 2000 05:56PM
As i recall in U-571 the two subs were at depth (below persicope depth).
Another silliness to a silly action movie.
As I posted above, I doubt a WWII era torpedo could be set to run at the depth necessary to hit a deeply submerged sub.
Another silliness to a silly action movie.
As I posted above, I doubt a WWII era torpedo could be set to run at the depth necessary to hit a deeply submerged sub.
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
submerged targets | Piet Stein | 11/02/2000 08:56AM |
RE: submerged targets | Antonio Veiga | 11/02/2000 08:07PM |
RE: submerged targets | David W | 11/03/2000 01:42AM |
RE: submerged targets | Steve Cooper | 11/03/2000 01:33PM |
RE: submerged targets | kurt | 11/03/2000 09:49PM |
Re: RE: submerged targets | Natter | 08/27/2011 04:19PM |
Re: RE: submerged targets | Natter | 03/23/2013 10:37PM |
RE: submerged targets | Andrew Hetherington | 11/05/2000 03:27PM |
RE: submerged targets | Rainer Bruns | 11/05/2000 04:45PM |
RE: submerged targets | Jerry Pope | 11/06/2000 01:23PM |
RE: submerged targets | Kurt | 11/21/2000 05:56PM |
RE: submerged targets | bernard zimmermann | 11/16/2000 01:22PM |
RE: submerged targets | Rainer Bruns | 11/16/2000 01:35PM |
RE: submerged targets | Richard Mickle | 11/16/2000 03:13PM |
RE: submerged targets | Rich Mickle | 11/16/2000 03:23PM |
RE: submerged targets | Antonio Veiga | 11/16/2000 10:08PM |
RE: submerged targets | Rich Mickle | 11/17/2000 10:40AM |
RE: submerged targets | Anders Wingren | 11/20/2000 06:17PM |