Re: Best Sub of WW2
Posted by: kurt ()
Date: January 09, 2002 10:45PM

Walter:

Right you are. A tiny number of XXIII patrols were made, with some scores (and losses, too, I believe), way too few to be considered strategically significant. Were the Type XXIII's too late to count? Sort of. Were they really midget subs? Not really, but they were mighty small.

I think the XXIII's were too small to be effective - short range, only two torpedoes with no reloads, so I wouldn't count it as a 'best sub' even if we let it into the running.



Subject Written By Posted
Best Sub of WW2 Gian Schoeman 01/09/2002 11:17AM
Re: Best Sub of WW2 kurt 01/09/2002 01:27PM
Re: Best Sub of WW2 walter M 01/09/2002 07:29PM
Re: Best Sub of WW2 kurt 01/09/2002 10:45PM
Re: Best Sub of WW2 J.T. McDaniel 01/10/2002 04:06AM
Re: Best Sub of WW2 Gian Schoeman 01/10/2002 07:48AM
Re: Best Sub of WW2 Innes McCartney 01/28/2002 09:34PM
Re: Best Sub of WW2 Rainer Bruns 01/30/2002 02:10PM