Warship forum
A forum for the Allied Warships section.
Re: HMS Croome
Posted by:
john
()
Date: November 06, 2005 06:37PM
Author : john
Date : 6.11.05
Thankyou for the most detailed input, so in theory Croome at the time of the loss of U 127 was infact still with the 12th EG & not as Rohwer states, presumably he assumed she was as with the other three detached from H. Can you clarify when Gurkha actually joined H, i think Foxhoud was in from 6/40 & Nestor sometime in 7/41. Once again thankyou for your time.
john
Date : 6.11.05
Thankyou for the most detailed input, so in theory Croome at the time of the loss of U 127 was infact still with the 12th EG & not as Rohwer states, presumably he assumed she was as with the other three detached from H. Can you clarify when Gurkha actually joined H, i think Foxhoud was in from 6/40 & Nestor sometime in 7/41. Once again thankyou for your time.
john
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
HMS Croome | john | 10/30/2005 11:57AM |
Re: HMS Croome | Dave Weaver | 11/04/2005 11:03AM |
Re: HMS Croome | john | 11/04/2005 06:29PM |
Re: HMS Croome | michel | 11/05/2005 06:46PM |
Re: HMS Croome | john | 11/06/2005 06:37PM |
Re: HMS Croome | michel | 11/06/2005 08:40PM |
Re: HMS Croome | Harry Wright | 01/18/2008 08:53PM |