Re: SMU-37, additional
Posted by:
Brian
()
Date: July 29, 2003 01:59AM
<HTML>This according th Sieche:
"U 31 had no deck gun when lost, U 32, 36 and 37 had 2-88 for a time". Could it be a mis-identification of the gun-less sub?
Brian</HTML>
"U 31 had no deck gun when lost, U 32, 36 and 37 had 2-88 for a time". Could it be a mis-identification of the gun-less sub?
Brian</HTML>
| Subject | Written By | Posted |
|---|---|---|
SMU-37
|
Yves D | 07/28/2003 08:56PM |
|
Re: SMU-37
|
Brian | 07/29/2003 01:55AM |
|
Re: SMU-37, additional
|
Brian | 07/29/2003 01:59AM |
|
Re: SMU-37, addenda
|
Yves D | 07/29/2003 04:48AM |
|
Re: SMU-37, additional
|
Yves D | 07/29/2003 04:33AM |
|
Re: SMU-37
|
john | 07/29/2003 04:17PM |
|
Re: SMU-37
|
Yves D | 07/29/2003 08:13PM |