WWI forum  
World War One discussions. 
Re: drifter Diligence
Posted by: Michael Lowrey ()
Date: December 19, 2008 11:49AM

Michael -- nice find.

Michael and Simon -- This is obviously a weird one, as it isn't in Spindler or British Vessels Lost at Sea 1914-18. My first thought is that this might be some sort of error in LWL, but Michael's find seems to eliminate that possibility.

The series of events described does tie things up nicely, with Diligence being a CTL but not sunk outright. That's a distinction without much of a practical difference and could explain why the vessel is listed as sunk in LWL but not listed in BVLAS (BVLAS doesn't have fishing vessels damaged section).

I have UC 21 and UB 37 as possibilities. Will take a look at both over the weekend. Note that the microfilm roll with UB 37, UB 38, and UB 39's KTB is the hardest to read of all the rolls I've seen

Best wishes,
Michael

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
drifter Diligence Michael D. 12/18/2008 08:42AM
Re: drifter Diligence Simon S. 12/18/2008 03:24PM
Re: drifter Diligence Michael Lowrey 12/19/2008 11:49AM
Re: drifter Diligence Simon S. 12/19/2008 04:05PM
Re: drifter Diligence Josephbremez 12/19/2008 04:26PM
Re: drifter Diligence Michael Lowrey 12/21/2008 12:07AM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   **     **  **     **  ********  **     ** 
 **     **  **     **   **   **      **      **   **  
 **     **  **     **    ** **       **       ** **   
 ********   *********     ***        **        ***    
 **         **     **    ** **       **       ** **   
 **         **     **   **   **      **      **   **  
 **         **     **  **     **     **     **     **