Re: U-34 and bioluminescence
Posted by:
Marcel Koken
()
Date: September 09, 2010 05:05AM
Dear Michael and Dan,
Thanks a lot for all these precisions.
So, if I understand you correctly, the idea of being sunk due to bioluminescence came only from the british claim, and can not be true for U-34.
Is anyone aware of bioluminescence being really implicated in the detection (and sinking) of marine ships ? Or is this just a hypothesis and a danger which boats try to avoid "just to not take the risk to be eventually be detected"?
Thanks again,
Marcel
Thanks a lot for all these precisions.
So, if I understand you correctly, the idea of being sunk due to bioluminescence came only from the british claim, and can not be true for U-34.
Is anyone aware of bioluminescence being really implicated in the detection (and sinking) of marine ships ? Or is this just a hypothesis and a danger which boats try to avoid "just to not take the risk to be eventually be detected"?
Thanks again,
Marcel
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
U-34 and bioluminescence | Marcel Koken | 09/06/2010 07:48PM |
Re: U-34 and bioluminescence | Josephbremez | 09/07/2010 04:07PM |
Re: U-34 and bioluminescence | Marcel Koken | 09/07/2010 07:49PM |
Re: U-34 and bioluminescence | Michael Lowrey | 09/07/2010 11:05PM |
Re: U-34 and bioluminescence | Marcel Koken | 09/09/2010 05:05AM |
Re: U-34 and bioluminescence | Michael Lowrey | 09/11/2010 02:46AM |
Re: U-34 and bioluminescence | DanOdenweller | 09/08/2010 10:11AM |