Re: SS Caithness U-Boat attack January 18, 1917
Posted by:
Oliver Lörscher
()
Date: May 01, 2016 05:54PM
Hi Susan,
ahm, not quite correct ...
U 52 survived the war
see: [uboat.net]
it was UB 52 which was sunk by HM submarine H 4
see: [uboat.net]
There was even an other "52" operational
see: [uboat.net]
But I can understand that this is not really easy to understand for non-Germans not deep into the Kaiser's U-Boats :-)
Oliver
ahm, not quite correct ...
U 52 survived the war
see: [uboat.net]
it was UB 52 which was sunk by HM submarine H 4
see: [uboat.net]
There was even an other "52" operational
see: [uboat.net]
But I can understand that this is not really easy to understand for non-Germans not deep into the Kaiser's U-Boats :-)
Oliver
| Subject | Written By | Posted |
|---|---|---|
SS Caithness U-Boat attack January 18, 1917
|
Susan Anderson | 04/26/2016 06:40PM |
|
Re: SS Caithness U-Boat attack January 18, 1917
|
Oliver Lörscher | 04/26/2016 07:46PM |
|
Re: SS Caithness U-Boat attack January 18, 1917
|
Oliver Lörscher | 04/26/2016 07:47PM |
|
Re: SS Caithness U-Boat attack January 18, 1917
|
Susan Anderson | 04/30/2016 09:47PM |
|
Re: SS Caithness U-Boat attack January 18, 1917
|
Oliver Lörscher | 05/01/2016 05:54PM |
|
Re: SS Caithness U-Boat attack January 18, 1917
|
Susan Anderson | 05/01/2016 08:42PM |